![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:15 • Filed to: Math, torque | ![]() | ![]() |
Take the weighted average of each of your vehicles’ drive types (and torque splits F/R for AWD vehicles) and express it as an overall percentage F/R.
For sake of simple calculations, we can calculate the weighted average of ONLY the % of torque to the rear wheels of each vehicle. After taking the weighted average, we can just subtract the %RWD from 100% to get the %FWD.
For example, say you have 2 RWD cars, one FWD car, and a 40/60 split AWD car. ( 2 * 100% + 1 * 0% + 1 * 60%) / 4 vehicles = 65%, or a 35/65 F/R torque bias.
Go wild & have fun, Oppo, as bikes & drones & pets count too!
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:18 |
|
I had a dream last night Georgia Tech rescinded my degree and I had to go back and complete three classes to graduate. To allay any actual anxiety, I checked and I’ve still got my degree, so I’ll pass on the math part.
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:21 |
|
Oh that’s rough, I’m sorry to bring back the math. 100% respect skipping the calculations haha
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:26 |
|
65 % RWD...I actually exactly have your hypothetical scenario
My fleet also has 306 ft-lbs on average ranging from 162 to 417
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:28 |
|
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:28 |
|
I can’t answer this as it’s very dependent. I have only one vehicle, my AWD G37x. From 0-12 mph, it’s AWD (split varies depending on launch), from 12-up, it’s at least 95% rear, usually 100% rear unless slip occurs. Of course there’s also the diff lock, which locks it in 50/50 up to 60 mph.
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:29 |
|
Math? What is this, school?
FWD, FWD, RWD and AWD (50/50 split max)
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:30 |
|
My fleet would average quite low thanks to my trucks 12.5lb/ft (seems like) bringing down my average
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:31 |
|
At the moment it’s 100%, because I have no reason to use the part-time 4wd in the 4Runner. But in winter and summer when I use it more it’s 83.33%. I’m not even going to try to include Ms. RPM’s AWD Volvo. I don’t math good.
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:32 |
|
Only 1 car, I'm all in FWD.
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:35 |
|
4 vehicles: 0%/ 100% FR bias.
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:42 |
|
33% RWD. This number is far too low. But there’s not really many great alternatives to hot hatches with RWD. Basically have to go into luxury cars to get 4 doors and similar performance.
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:48 |
|
uh 0% across 6 cars
and 3 don’t even run
![]() 04/27/2020 at 15:58 |
|
Sadly, I believe our 3 car average is 0% since all three are FWD. Calculating torque would be a struggle too since their average age is 12.5 years and t
hey’ve only had normal maintenance, it’s hard to say how many ponies have escaped the stable over the last decade..
![]() 04/27/2020 at 16:26 |
|
59.5%fwd, electric torque baby
914 98
911 189
Crz 128
Volt 294
![]() 04/27/2020 at 17:17 |
|
counting my three basically operational cars, 33/67%
Add in the projects and such, and it’s 20/80%
I’ve only got 1 FWD, but it’s the one that I trust to work 100% of the time and usually commute with
![]() 04/27/2020 at 17:23 |
|
So I have two vehicles, one 4WD and the other AWD. When (fully) engaged they are both at 50/50 split. The Regal has twin clutch torque vectoring so that makes things messy since it can engage either rear wheel individually and f rom 0% up to 50%.
Considering for normal on-road conditions I do not use 4WD in the truck , I’ll treat the truck as 2WD. However the Regal is always actively engaging to some degree up to 50/50 split.
So F/R = 25 /75 on-road , but capable of 50 /50 .
![]() 04/27/2020 at 18:45 |
|
Math is hard, I have 3 vehicles, one AWD that is 60/40 split, one RWD and one all time 4wd so 50/50 for that one.
![]() 04/27/2020 at 18:55 |
|
Me? 0%. But if I factor in some family members we have a 12.5% with the 4wd Tundra.
![]() 04/27/2020 at 19:25 |
|
My garage is 1 FWD car which is pretty boring so I’m extending it to my family’s combined garage. That gives me 2 FWDs, 1 RWD, and 2 60/40 AWDs. If I’m doing the math right that’s 56/44 F/R.
![]() 04/27/2020 at 22:28 |
|
100% RWD.