![]() 09/02/2019 at 18:11 • Filed to: Spacelopnik | ![]() | ![]() |
In this case, maybe less disruption would be welcome.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 09/02/2019 at 18:56 |
|
Who didn’t see that coming?
![]() 09/02/2019 at 19:13 |
|
We have ways of dealing with you, Yankee
![]() 09/02/2019 at 19:20 |
|
“No rules in space” but it just makes sense that right-of-way ought to be based on first-come-first-served. I mean c’mon this isn’t rocket sci— er, brain surgery.
That said, am I missing something here? Did SpaceX have a valid reason to expect Aeolus to yield ? Like is there some need for the Starlink “constellation” to maintain a particular constant formation? Would moving one satellite have required moving the rest of them as well?
The only other excuse I can think of is if SpaceX somehow had more accurate satellite path tracking, and was able to foresee that the “1 in 1,000” collision risk was in fact going to be nothing but a near miss.
![]() 09/02/2019 at 19:56 |
|
Are you accusing techbros of feeling entitled to do whatever they want without considering the consequences to others?
![]() 09/02/2019 at 22:52 |
|
Out of the way, commie scum! Freedom coming through!
![]() 09/03/2019 at 08:30 |
|
yes come and get us wait wrong raptor
edit:
![]() 09/03/2019 at 09:39 |
|
ESA space bullying now? Move your sat so we don't have to.
![]() 09/03/2019 at 13:01 |
|
Congrats on the DTracy shout out today.
![]() 09/03/2019 at 13:06 |
|
Thanks. Wasn’t sure when that would appear and I’m pleasantly surprised he mentioned me. The interview was pretty short.
Not terribly surprised that the photo he chose from my collection was o f his own Jeep.