![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:21 • Filed to: politics | ![]() | ![]() |
Probably not for the same reason though.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Somehow this policy still has bipartisan support .
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:36 |
|
Let’s see: reduced ethanol production, trade war with China so nowhere to sell all the corn. Looks like we’ll be buying corn for about 2¢/ear in the store soon. But don’t worry. Trump will just buy off the farmers with another payout.
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:36 |
|
“noting that demand for four billion gallons of biofuels has been destroyed because of the waivers over the last three years.”
We’re sick of your corn lobby Iowa.
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:37 |
|
obligatory
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:39 |
|
Because ADM and Valero Energy fund both Ds and Rs, that’s why it has bipartisan support.
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:40 |
|
Corn belongs in tortillas not tanks
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:41 |
|
All this aside for a moment. What’s the consensus on ethanol these days? Still does more harm than good?
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:52 |
|
I see that emoji in Buzzfeed “stories” all the time. Is it just a clapping hand?
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:53 |
|
Yep, for the most part. Unless you’re tuning your car, in which case getting
108 octane at the regular
pump is pretty awesome.
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:54 |
|
Well, then, we’ll just see if I EVER eat another ADM vegetable EVER AGAIN!
Whoops, already broke my promise. Boycotting stuff is hard.
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:55 |
|
Yes
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:57 |
|
But if you ask them about their subsidy, they get irate. Handouts are socialism, but only when they go to ‘other’ people.
![]() 08/28/2019 at 16:58 |
|
There are companies that are boycott proof. ADM may be one of them.
![]() 08/28/2019 at 17:01 |
|
I’ve seen the phrase “ crime against humanity” used to describe it in a non-sarcastic way.
![]() 08/28/2019 at 17:02 |
|
I think that it is difficult to answer that question. The way that alcohol is currently produced requires more energy than can be released by the alcohol. Petroleum products are used to fertilizer the corn, operate the machinery, and produce heat for the distillation process. It is my understanding that the energy in the petroleum exceeds the energy in the alcohol. I wonder, however, if the process could be changed to make it more efficient.
When I was in college, I went to a lecture by a Pennsylvania farmer who had converted his tractors to alcohol (he was not an engineer, and just “fiddled” with the engines to make them run properly). The leftover mash from fermentation was used to feed his cattle. Overall, he showed numbers that indicated increased productivity and profit by using homemade alcohol.
Despite the fact that he could not drink alcohol (religious restrictions), the police made him shut down his still because it is illegal to produce ethanol in Pennsylvania.
![]() 08/28/2019 at 17:04 |
|
Yes. Corn farming is gnarly to the environment and we’re using far more oil with ethanol than without.
![]() 08/28/2019 at 17:05 |
|
The last buyouts were horribly mismanaged, with some families basically ripping off Uncle Sugar.
The Environmental Working Group, using data received under the Freedom of Information Act, found individual farmers in five states — Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Tennessee and Texas — received more than $900,000 in 2018, largely through a loophole that allowed each member of a farm-owning family to apply for relief.
Money flowed to foreign-owned businesses and to those who don’t live or work on a farm, including an architect in Manhattan , Chinese conglomerates and Brazilian beef companies. More than $38 million in aid money went to residents of cities including San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York and Washington. ( WaPo )
![]() 08/28/2019 at 17:06 |
|
If you aren’t watching Simpsons in German...are you even watching it at all?
![]() 08/28/2019 at 17:07 |
|
Yep, plus corn uses
a ton of water, too...which is increasing in focus, as well (especially in areas of scarcity)
![]() 08/28/2019 at 18:29 |
|
I can't think of a corny pun to put here...
![]() 08/28/2019 at 20:32 |
|
![]() 08/28/2019 at 20:42 |
|
Ein für mich!
![]() 08/29/2019 at 08:37 |
|
yeah the mighty car mods fellas really like the stuff
![]() 08/29/2019 at 08:37 |
|
so the administration is agreeing on something harmful to the environment, got it, haha.
![]() 08/29/2019 at 08:40 |
|
Haha that’s the impression I have. The reason I was curious. What’s the point on the administration agreeing on this if it’s harmful to the environment in the first place... “yay there’s bi-partisan support for all oil companies to harm the environment equally”
![]() 08/29/2019 at 08:44 |
|
wow that sucks. So what we’ve got here is: there’s bi-partisan support for oil companies to harm the environment equally and some dude that found a more efficient way got shut down, by the government.
So at the end of a day I don’t give a shit if there’s bi-partisan support on this, at the end of the day they are agreeing to continue harming the environment.
So our elected representatives are so insanely stupid that they require production of a fuel at a net-loss? And they’ve continue to commit for years and years. Admitting failure isn’t an option?