"Bandit" (2bandit)
05/30/2019 at 20:21 • Filed to: None
0
23|
"Bandit" (2bandit)
05/30/2019 at 20:21 • Filed to: None | 0
| 23 |
Better than the CT5 for sure. Interior looks miles better than the ATS/CTS in pictures at least.
ranwhenparked
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:28 |
|
Sure, and it is definitely way better looking than the CT5.
CarsofFortLangley - Oppo Forever
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:28 |
|
Meh. I'd buy a Mazda 6 signature over it
404 - User No Longer Available
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:30 |
|
Externally if I cover the front and back it’s just an ATS again...
And I still won’t forgive them for making the Escala liftgate design into a trunk.
AestheticsInMotion
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:30 |
|
Yes, but it still doesn't hold up to past CTS-V and ATS-V's in the looks department
412GTI
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:31 |
|
Do they look fine? Yes. Do they look special? No. The new interiors are way better indeed, but I don’t see these being distinguishable enough.
Arch Duke Maxyenko, Shit Talk Extraordinaire
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:31 |
|
It’s a bit safe looking. The ATS-V coupe is rather stunning if you ever see one.
KingT- 60% of the time, it works every time
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:33 |
|
My problem is not with the looks inside and out or even the engine specs. My problem is this should straight up NOT be a CT4-V, it should be a CT4-V sport.
farscythe - makin da cawfee!
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:35 |
|
hmmmm... nope
its okay looking... i guess
CRider
> 404 - User No Longer Available
05/30/2019 at 20:35 |
|
If you cover the front and back of a BMW it’s still going to look like a BMW, isn’t it?
|
404 - User No Longer Available
> CRider
05/30/2019 at 20:36 |
|
Not really.
CT5 looks much different than the CTS. CT4 looks more like an ATS refresh.
DaftRyosuke - So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!
> Arch Duke Maxyenko, Shit Talk Extraordinaire
05/30/2019 at 20:37 |
|
The sedan always looked better to me. The CT4 definitely looks like a best of both worlds situation.
CB
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:47 |
|
If you held a gun to my head I couldn’t tell you which was which.
fintail
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:48 |
|
At least it doesn’t have that dumb C-pillar detail.
I am not in love with the name either, more of one trick pony DeNysschen’s cloned ideals.
The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:49 |
|
It looks like it has a tear drop tattoo.
VajazzleMcDildertits - read carefully, respond politely
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:50 |
|
Looks ok. Interior looks pretty good too. I’m not in love with it but I wouldn’t say no to a spirited drive in it.
You can tell a Finn but you can't tell him much
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 20:54 |
|
To me it looks like an Impala with Pep Boys LEDs down the side of the face and a Cadillac emblem stuck in the grille. But what do I know, I think the STI looks damn good.
|
ranwhenparked
> CB
05/30/2019 at 21:09 |
|
Hint: The CT5 is the one with all the cheap plastic cladding glued to the side of it.
merged-5876237249235911857-hrw8uc
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 21:20 |
|
“We are inviting even more customers into the V-Series family by adding a new level of elevated performance between our Sport models and the ultimate, high-performance track capability that the V-Series has grown to represent.”
As a previous first gen CTS-V owner, I say fuck you cadillac. If you want to dilute the V-badge, then at least have the common decency to call it what it is .... V-sport. Then at least it’s differentiated from the true V cars. Nice cars, sure, but not a true V worthy car.
Monkey B
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 21:51 |
|
interior is very reminiscent to e90 era BMW design ...except it’s bland. The trim around the cluster should not match the dash and too many design cues that carry across the GM brands offerings. If they want Cadillac to compete it has to stand out...not from the competition because it does differ, but from GM itself.
Xanadu603
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 22:07 |
|
If you took the badge off I might have guessed it was Korean I think. I like the Lincolns, they are sharp now.
AMC/Renauledge
> Bandit
05/30/2019 at 22:48 |
|
It’s definitely more interesting and attractive than the CT5. And it doesn’t have that awful fake C-pillar window.
It’s a little too thick-set for me, but I’ll reserve final judgment until I see it in the metal.
Neil drives a beetle and a fancy beetle
> KingT- 60% of the time, it works every time
05/31/2019 at 09:42 |
|
Ehhh; I’m guessing V-Sport didn’t create a sense of desirability. Audi has such a great top to bottom A, S, RS lineup with desirability from bottom to top and I’m guessing that going CT4, V-Sport, V didn’t resonate with consumer focus groups. But I’m guessing that they’ll have some kind of higher trim down the line.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Bandit
11/10/2019 at 11:45 |
|
It looks nice in a “Look mom, I made an Acura” sort of way