![]() 12/27/2019 at 20:40 • Filed to: the low kwality content will continue | ![]() | ![]() |
You may have known they sold the first S5 with the 4.2 V8, and a manual was an option. But you know that from 2013 -2017, the S5 had shifted to the 3.0T — also available with a manual? INDEED!
You see, the RS5 debuted the same year in ‘Murica (2012ish/ 2013 ) , but had the old (though updated) 4.2. Now, while the RS5 has upgraded this and that and suspension stuffs whatever, electric steering ( BOOOOO! ), basically Audi moved their existing S5 upmarket and charged more for it. Even more annoying, there are zero 2012-2018 RS5s with a stick sale, implying perhaps... it was not even an option in the US? Reminiscent of their treatment of the TT-RS (no manual).
But anyway, what’s the downside to the 2013 -2017 manual Audi S5? Well for one thing, it’s an Audi. Even a reliable-ish one costs dollars to keep on the road. J ust read !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! , as he struggled to find a clutch job at a reasonable price for his 3.0T S4:
The cost of entry is also still high: $25k-40k depending on year, miles, etc:
If you want a color that isn’t black, expect a premium on that as well.
Sooooooooooooooo good!
I haven’t crossed it off the List of Meaninglessness™, as it remains cheaper than the Chevy SS, farrrrr more common than the E500 wagon (although probably reliable), and still more accessible than a 2011+ IS-F that hasn’t been trashed.
Oh screw it, I give up. I’m buying another death trap Tercel.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 20:50 |
|
I like that your only two options are either something incredibly cheap (Toyota Tercel) or something incredibly expensive like an Audi
![]() 12/27/2019 at 20:53 |
|
You ever met those people who either have no confidence or think they are the greatest thing since sliced bread? This is the automotive version of that.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 20:55 |
|
It’s not my fault my brain is glossing over 1987-2010.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 21:00 |
|
Based on the amount of self-flagellation in this post, I feel like you should just commit and buy a 2003 Range Rover with the imploding BMW 4.4l engine.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 21:08 |
|
![]() 12/27/2019 at 21:19 |
|
Eh, I can't blame you. Lots of garbage produced in that era.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 21:24 |
|
My friend just bought the same gen S4 with the DSG and uum yeah, its pretty amazing....that supercharger scream is worth everything
![]() 12/27/2019 at 21:28 |
|
Easiest thing to do is to go for a 435i instead. They’re slightly less reliable (allegedly?), leading to far lower resale (also not personally verified). Easier to find with a stick and better to drive (marginally?). The 3.0T has nothing on an N55.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 21:33 |
|
$1k for a flywheel on that Audi? That’s insane. You can buy BMW flywheels for $300.
I’ll be replacing the flywheel, clutch, pilot bearing, TOB and RMS on my Jeep next week. Parts cost me $300 with shipping.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 21:38 |
|
I’d rather the 430i GC, but if I’m going Bimmer, I’d sooner overpay for a facelifted E91 RWD manual than a 4-series.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 21:49 |
|
As underwhelming as the 3.0t is, I don’t know I’d I would call the N55 better. They’re both pretty disappointing.
The new Audi 3.0 and the b58 are a different story.
Also, Audi isn't afraid to fit their cars with an lsd.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 21:55 |
|
Dealers quote a lot because the easiest way to do it is to drop the engine and transmission together. Something about the flywheel and the half shafts for the front. I don’t recall.
The idea that replacing the transmission would be easier makes no sense. The transmission is strong and the clutch is serviceable when you get to it.
Is it possible they had t he dual clutch and the clutches had worn? As strong as those are , that would be a major overhaul if it started to slip bad.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 21:57 |
|
I think it’s more possible that that particular Audi dealer was composed of shady assholes who wanted to swindle $9k out of someone.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 22:32 |
|
Think how many Tercels you could buy for the maintenance on one of these.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 22:32 |
|
Sounds about right. 100 0 in parts and 8000 in labor. Classic dealer move.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 22:34 |
|
No.
What about the Scion im hatch?
![]() 12/27/2019 at 22:37 |
|
I already own the 11-year old version of that car.
![]() 12/27/2019 at 22:39 |
|
About 1.35 Paseo’s worth of exceptional Tercels.
![]() 12/28/2019 at 01:18 |
|
and now for some bad news - even these are now subject to the Bring a Trailer premium:
https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1985-toyota-tercel-4wd-sr5-wagon-2/
![]() 12/28/2019 at 01:25 |
|
Why do I even get out of bed anymore...
![]() 12/28/2019 at 02:02 |
|
I said they were pretty much equal, and they were easily the best ‘ mainstream‘ engines of their time. What else?
Audi isn’t afraid to fit their cars with terminal understeer, either.
![]() 12/28/2019 at 03:41 |
|
I didn’t see that anywhere. Only read your opinion that the “3.0T has nothing on an N55," which isn't exactly true.
Neither car is known for having a stellar chassis or great handling unfortunately.
![]() 12/28/2019 at 09:06 |
|
My neighbor across the street has an old S4 in V8 Manaul. It sounds pretty mean when he starts it up - can’t be the stock exhaust.
Meanwhile it’s my birthday and I’ve never managed to get posting privileges so post Jaguars, e28s, SAABs and 240s
![]() 12/28/2019 at 10:15 |
|
Even an APR stage 1 adds like 100hp on the old 3.0T though. Stage 2 is like 480hp.
![]() 12/28/2019 at 10:28 |
|
The 3.0t is a good engine. So is the N55. They just don't have the same level of potential as some of the more modern engines.
![]() 12/28/2019 at 12:04 |
|
Ya know...