![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:22 • Filed to: Clock, Wall clock, Clocklopnik, shitpost | ![]() | ![]() |
Re-hanging my mother’s clock after a battery change, when I realised something funny
... (UPDATE BELOW)
Update: I do now realise that it’s not necessarily a problem, but I’ll wait to see if any comments come in
.
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:25 |
|
There’s no IV
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:30 |
|
It’s kind of a thing apparently
https://monochrome-watches.com/why-do-clocks-and-watches-use-roman-numeral-iiii-instead-of-iv/
Learned something new, I’ve never looked that closely before.
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:30 |
|
I
II
III
IIII
IIIII
IIIIX
IIIX
IIX
IX
X
11
T W E L V E
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:30 |
|
Alot of older clocks actually use IIII instead of IV. The post office here in my city was built in 1913 and the clock on it uses IIII.
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:31 |
|
Is it missing a hand?
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:32 |
|
I thought so too, but I think they’re just overlapping.
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:33 |
|
The numbers are upside down!
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:37 |
|
apparently most roman numeral clocks use IIII instead of IV as a way or aesthetically balancing out the VIII on the opposing side of the face.
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:45 |
|
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:50 |
|
Yep quite a few old clock faces use IIII!
Thank you Wikipedia.
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:56 |
|
One hand is missing?
![]() 01/18/2019 at 00:58 |
|
That’s interesting. Now I’m going to have to look for this, and I’ll know the reasoning behind it.
![]() 01/18/2019 at 01:14 |
|
I think yo u’re right though based on the time, I think either than hands or the labels would have to be a bit out of alignment for that.
![]() 01/18/2019 at 07:15 |
|
The 4 is labelled as IIII instead of IV.
Interesting.
![]() 01/18/2019 at 18:58 |
|
THAT clock loses 2 hours a day!