![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:23 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Or is it just perception since companies who make straight sixes, like BMW, probably make better engines than companies like GM who make more V6s.
Because I’ve decided my dream/next DD will have either an inline six or V8, bench seats, column shifted automatic, and either be a liftback or have a ginormous trunk.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:27 |
|
Yes.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:29 |
|
I thought that i6 were inherintly balanced and v6 needed balancing shafts. But
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:30 |
|
Are you really Patrick George?
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:30 |
|
60 degree V6s don’t, but 90 degree V6s do IIRC.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:31 |
|
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:32 |
|
next DD will have either an inline six or V8, bench seats, column shifted automatic, and either be a liftback or have a ginormous trunk.
You’re welcome! 225 slant 6!
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:34 |
|
Yes.
No, it is not just perception.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:34 |
|
GM made inline 5s and 6s for a while in the Trailblazer, Colorado, Hummer H3, etc. I’ll bet one of those had a bench seat option.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:35 |
|
Are the primary and secondary forces balanced ina 60°?
I ask... I honestly don’t know...
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:35 |
|
Yes. But also yes... because we are human after all.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:35 |
|
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-pros-and-cons-of-V6-and-inline-6-engines
A I6 is better balanced, but can’t easily be used in a FWD configuration. While this isn’t a problem for BMW it does become an issue for a mainstream manufacturer to justifly a model specific engine.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:36 |
|
Wait, wait, you want a V8, column shifter, bench seats, and a huge trunk? We should talk.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:40 |
|
Yes
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:40 |
|
Too bad the I6 never made it to the Colorado and Camaro
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:43 |
|
bUt CaN’t EaSiLy Be UsEd In a fWd CoNfIgUrAtIoN
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:44 |
|
V6s are basically two I3s sharing a crank. Odd-cylinder count engines are rough because there is always a more cylinders moving in one direction than in the opposite. They need balance shafts and counterweights to run smoothly.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:46 |
|
Don’t forget the Suzuki Verona!
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:55 |
|
How can you prove it?
![]() 04/07/2018 at 18:58 |
|
https://jalopnik.com/heres-the-differences-between-a-v6-and-straight-six-eng-1791734882
“Packaging is a big issue with the straight-six, though. It’s just kind of hard to fit in cars, can throw off the center of gravity, is nearly impossible for front-wheel-drive setups, and loses some rigidity over other engine options due to being a little stretched out and skinny.
V6 engines litter the lot of current supercars, including the Nissan GT-R and new Acura NSX. It’s more compact, making it easier to snuggle in some turbocharging, works better for front-wheel-drive applications, and makes it easier to fill a vehicle lineup with the same basic engine layout. Copy/Paste.”
Never said impossible
![]() 04/07/2018 at 19:02 |
|
Or this.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 19:07 |
|
I don’t need to prove it.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 19:14 |
|
OMG yes. Out of the box, the i6 is inherently balanced, and one of the three perfect engines. See also: V12 and a boxer 6
The V6 is a compromise for mostly packaging and fitment. Compared to the three mentioned above, the V6 is a hot mess.
https://www.caranddriver.com/features/the-physics-of-engine-cylinder-bank-angles-feature
![]() 04/07/2018 at 19:35 |
|
I would guess that they are. The direction of motion and weight are the same with inline, which would mean that they perfectly cancel out, vs going in different directions.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 19:35 |
|
If you go back further, an I6 was the standard engine in the Camaro through 1979.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 20:11 |
|
My 240Z is smooth, my truck is an I6 but it’s a flathead from the 50's so I’m not sure it will help the argument.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 20:19 |
|
yup! And that’s just another reason they should’ve used the Atlas in the new Camaro :o)
I liked the idea of a nice modern American DOHC I6
If the new Camaro had the Atlas and T-tops it would almost be awesome enough to look past not being able to see out of it.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 20:44 |
|
Inline-6 engines are smoother because the piston movements are naturally balanced in typical designs. In a 60-degree design there are ways to arrange the firing order but it’s never as smooth as an inline-6.
A 90-degree V6 has too many perpendicular-action forces at play to be smooth without a good counter-balance design. Inline-4s have issues due to having too few cylinders, and inline 3s or 5s are just weird. V8s can be fairly smooth - and v12s can be buttery-smooth. Nothing beats an electric though - but they don’t make real vroom-vroom noises.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 23:10 |
|
Idk, might just be primary.
![]() 04/07/2018 at 23:13 |
|
So you want a Crown Vic?
![]() 04/08/2018 at 00:33 |
|
“look past not being able to see”
![]() 04/08/2018 at 03:16 |
|
HoldMyBeer@HondaCBX.com
![]() 04/08/2018 at 11:29 |
|
I’d take one. Although preferably a Town Car or Grand Marquis, because I’m a man of class.
![]() 04/08/2018 at 17:01 |
|
In theory, yes, straight sixes are more balanced. In practice the balance shafts and tolerances have gotten good enough lately that a modern v6 is going to be better balanced than a straight six of yore.
![]() 04/26/2018 at 13:07 |
|
I-6's and V12's are the only engine configurations that inherently have perfect balance. V6's pretty much always require at least one balance shaft to reduce NVH.