"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
04/02/2017 at 20:41 • Filed to: None
6
6|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
04/02/2017 at 20:41 • Filed to: None | 6
| 6 |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
V12 Jake- Hittin' Switches
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/02/2017 at 21:03 |
|
YES PLEASE
Dr. Zoidberg - RIP Oppo
> V12 Jake- Hittin' Switches
04/02/2017 at 22:07 |
|
NOT YOU AGAIN
|
V12 Jake- Hittin' Switches
> Dr. Zoidberg - RIP Oppo
04/02/2017 at 23:02 |
|
It’s DAT BOI , back at it again...
JeepJeremy
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/02/2017 at 23:05 |
|
I would drive the shit outta that!
Tapas
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/03/2017 at 01:18 |
|
Ok, this bothers me -
The angles of the windows in the C, D and E pillar dont match up.
Like C & D windows should meet at the same angles. D and E should do the same... I can live with E being off if the car’s rear is build that way.
AfromanGTO
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/03/2017 at 13:06 |
|
Yes!