"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
11/22/2017 at 14:18 • Filed to: None | 1
| 10 |
fintail
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/22/2017 at 14:23 |
|
Reminds me of the 61 Caddy, with lower and upper fins:
Rust and Dust - Oppositelock Forever
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/22/2017 at 14:25 |
|
bwp240
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/22/2017 at 14:29 |
|
When you need more downforce on your downforce...
Thomas Donohue
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/22/2017 at 14:35 |
|
What....is that? A ducktail with a wing? Does the whole thing go up when the real wing is actuated?
It’s a parachute.
Chariotoflove
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/22/2017 at 14:38 |
|
Wonder what that looks like in a wind tunnel.
wafflesnfalafel
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/22/2017 at 14:41 |
|
agree - pick one, either duck tail or elevated but not both.. I kinda wish Porsche would bring back a true whale tale, (maybe it mucks with the aero too much...)
InFierority Complex
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/22/2017 at 14:41 |
|
Mediocre
Now we’re talkin.
|
11/22/2017 at 15:36 |
|
An-22 carrying a wing component from the second, never completed An-225.
marshknute
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/22/2017 at 16:05 |
|
Needs MOAR wing!!!
415s30 W123TSXWaggoIIIIIIo ( •_•))°)
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
11/26/2017 at 16:00 |
|
I bet that aero is messy and more like a block of concrete on the back, one or the other buddy. I like a duck.