"No, I don't thank you for the fish at all" (notindetroit)
03/26/2016 at 16:52 • Filed to: None
0
5|
"No, I don't thank you for the fish at all" (notindetroit)
03/26/2016 at 16:52 • Filed to: None | 0
| 5 |
It’s very subtle and I can’t even confirm if it’s a mistake or just my imagination, but after GIS’ing for 15 minutes I’m convinced there’s actually a graphical error here.
UPDATE: !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
jovimon7
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
03/26/2016 at 17:01 |
|
Mustang on top, that would be correct.
Sam
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
03/26/2016 at 17:09 |
|
I don’t know.
Looks right to me.
PorkchoPlissken
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
03/26/2016 at 17:39 |
|
Not sur, but for some reason the goat doesn’t look right. Can’t quite figure it out.
samssun
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
03/26/2016 at 19:14 |
|
Now that’s attention to detail.
That's gonna leave a mark!
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
03/27/2016 at 07:03 |
|
Wow, you guys can spot the smallest of details that don’t look right. If I post the picture from my latest colonoscopy do you think you can help me spot anything the Doc missed?