![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:06 • Filed to: gumpert, apollo, apollo arrow, geneva | ![]() | ![]() |
I certainly think so...
this looks quite good - the C pillar especially:
(i think the rear is a little ugly though)
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:12 |
|
It's a P1 with an autozone body kit
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:12 |
|
I really like it. It’s certainly better than this thing.....
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:15 |
|
That’s a very nice McLaren you have there.
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:16 |
|
I like. At a glance it looks like the wind is going to be very much at a loss as to where to go when it hits the sides, but I don’t give a damn about the wind and its feelings.
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:17 |
|
Holy shit they actually designed it this time!
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:20 |
|
but...
...but... but...
the c pillar!
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:25 |
|
I do like the c pillar...
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:29 |
|
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:38 |
|
Gumpert needs a name change. Has the same appeal as Drumpf.
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:44 |
|
What a turnaround in the looks department.
![]() 03/01/2016 at 12:49 |
|
Wikipedia says they pulled a Drumpf and dropped the ‘Gumpert’ part of the name when they got bought out some years back - now just Apollo Automobiles.
![]() 03/01/2016 at 13:17 |
|
I always like the Gumpert Apollo..........Such a bad ass track car you “could” drive on the street.
![]() 03/01/2016 at 22:42 |
|
I’d want to see what the MotorTrend’s Top Gear’s of the world say about it on their test drives.
The look may be similar to a degree to the Mclaren P1, thats okay. I still think we need Gumpert to think of bonkers cars to make. Because thats the oppositelock way. :P