![]() 02/04/2016 at 20:21 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
And definitely the hottest Mustang II ever made. Among other mods, the front wheels have been moved a full 12 inches forward to accommodate a highly modified Triton V10. !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! .
![]() 02/04/2016 at 20:27 |
|
I saw this thing on the Velocity SEMA coverage. I friggin’ love it.
![]() 02/04/2016 at 20:28 |
|
390 horsepower and 475 pound/feet of torque...
I like that he went this way with this engine, it’s unique and quirky... But man the triton is an underpowered boat anchor.
![]() 02/04/2016 at 20:30 |
|
Hey now, that’s almost Turbo 4.0 V6 territory there.
![]() 02/04/2016 at 20:34 |
|
I love how it looks from the front wheels on back, and the engine swap is quirky. That V10 did its job of standing out at SEMA and the Optima Street Car Challenge.
That said, I prefer the nose of the Monroe handler bodykit and the fact they made the Mustang II into the lightweight, hi-powered Mustang it was supposed to be.
![]() 02/04/2016 at 20:45 |
|
Dear lord that is sexy. And real fender flares, not stupid bolt on crap!
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:02 |
|
What's the turning radius?
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:13 |
|
Holy balls! That extra wheelbase looks amazing on that thing.
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:15 |
|
many. many radii.
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:22 |
|
Um......
Really good for one thing, going really fast in a straight line.
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:23 |
|
I think I would live with some additional 3 point turns as compromise to drive that sex on wheels. If Mustang II’s came with those proportions factory they wouldn’t be the black sheep of the Mustang liniage
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:26 |
|
That it what a muscle car is for. It’s also built on a Corvette chassis & suspension, and is lighter than the Corvette. I think it’ll handle just fine.
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:26 |
|
I agree, and also I already live that life as an S60R DDriver. I look like a goddamn beginner every time I round tight parking ramp corner. But I love it even more because of that.
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:40 |
|
Moving the front axle forward does so much good for the car’s proportions.
A couple people mentioned turning radius issues. The Mustang II shipped with a 96" wheelbase, which just so happens to be exactly 12" shorter than the 108" wheelbase of the original Mustang and about an inch longer than every Mustang built since 2005. Given those figures, unless the Mustang has a reputation for terrible turning radius, it should be fine, right?
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:44 |
|
On the other hand, I’m sure those massive wheels aren’t helping turn radius at all...
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:51 |
|
Ugh I just want to know what it sounds like
![]() 02/04/2016 at 21:57 |
|
A big factor is also steering lock. They probably had to build a custom steering rack for it, so the wheels might not be able to turn as far as the stock car.
![]() 02/04/2016 at 22:15 |
|
First time I see a mustang 2 that is nice to look at...
![]() 02/04/2016 at 22:19 |
|
All the changes bring the look closer to a badass Capri, which was always the sexy older sister to the gawky mustang II (imho)
![]() 02/05/2016 at 16:19 |
|
That’s been blowing up my FB lol