"Supercars"

"The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes) 12/14/2016 at 15:36 • Filed to: None

1

8

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

The 911 for sure is, and dare I say the Esprit. For “forgotten”, the MB SL is, and weird mustang thing. The rest are not.

SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 12/14/2016 at 15:41

1

The Esprit definitely is because flat-pane V8. Still don’t know how I feel about Beetles being considered supercars. The rest make it bad by “well, I guess we have to come up with something for this list” standards.

Tripper > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 12/14/2016 at 15:41

1

I agree but I’ve got the hots for that Alfa, any GTV really.

The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock > SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie 12/14/2016 at 15:45

0

The one listed is not a V8. I still love to drive it, but it’s barely a supercar.

The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock > Tripper 12/14/2016 at 15:46

1

Me too, but it’s a sports car. Not a supercar.

SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 12/14/2016 at 15:48

1

Poo. Not a supercar at all then. Forgot that they made turbo 4s for these and thought that that was limited to the V8.

The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock > SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie 12/14/2016 at 15:57

0

Handling wise it could hang with supercars.

SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 12/14/2016 at 15:59

1

So can my MR2.

IanZ - limited-slip indifferential > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock 12/14/2016 at 17:34

1

The Esprit and the NSX I would consider supercars, but the the rest? Not even close. With the exception of maybe the 911 Turbo, which I always feel weird about calling a “supercar” because it’s basically a higher trim level of a sports car.