![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:04 • Filed to: CODE STELVIO, it's just a Nissan Leopard that some Italian weirdos fucked with | ![]() | ![]() |
ALL OPPO DISCUSSION MUST BE ABOUT HOW AWESOME THE AUTECH STELVIO’S INTEGRATED FENDER-MOUNTED SIDE-VIEW MIRRORS ARE
THE CODE STELVIO WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT FOR AS LONG AS IS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE OPPO ZAGATO COUNCIL
COMPLIANCE IS MANDATORY
NON-COMPLIANCE WILL NOT BE TOLERATED
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:07 |
|
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:15 |
|
That doesn’t even look aerodynamically efficient
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:18 |
|
Those, along with all fender mirrors, are terrible. They don’t work, and they don’t look good.
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:19 |
|
The wheels have Naca ducts. Of course it’s aerodynamically efficient.
POINTING OUT THE NACA DUCTS POINT IN THE SAME DIRECTION, SUCKING AIR OUT FROM ONE SIDE OF THE CAR WHILE BLOWING AIR UNDER THE OTHER WILL RESULT IN NON-COMPLIANCE
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:21 |
|
FAILURE TO CORRECT THIS BY POSTING FULL-SIZED MIRRORS THAT ARE INTEGRATED INTO AN EXTERNAL BODY PANEL WILL RESULT IN NON-COMPLIANCE
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:22 |
|
FAILURE TO MS PAINT OVER THE MIRRORS AND ADD AT LEAST 20% MORE CONFUSING ANGLES WILL RESULT IN NON-COMPLIANCE
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:23 |
|
God those are hideous
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:24 |
|
so... 4th gen Camaros?
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:26 |
|
How will I not be tolerated anymore?
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:27 |
|
I quite like the SZ styling.
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:28 |
|
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:29 |
|
BIGLY UGLY
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:32 |
|
But......
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:32 |
|
Can the surface of the mirror be adjusted?
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:34 |
|
I agree. With everything.
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:35 |
|
IT CAN BE ADJUSTED USING ELECTRONICS INSTALLED BY THE UNDISPUTED MASTERS OF AUTOMOTIVE ELECTRONICS: THE ITALIANS
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:36 |
|
I like the styling, I hate the proportions.
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:49 |
|
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:52 |
|
You don’t look aerodynamically efficient.
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:53 |
|
This is amazing. Tell me this also has fliplights.
![]() 12/02/2016 at 17:57 |
|
It doesn’t. Am disappoint
![]() 12/02/2016 at 19:46 |
|
Is saying that this thing looks terrible considered non-compliance? Because it looks terrible.
![]() 12/02/2016 at 19:47 |
|
Much better
![]() 12/02/2016 at 19:53 |
|
It’s looks waaay better with out them.
![]() 12/02/2016 at 20:20 |
|
That. Is. Hideous.
![]() 12/02/2016 at 20:20 |
|
so, what I’m hearing then is they cannot be adjusted.
![]() 12/02/2016 at 20:25 |
|
YOUR FAILURE TO TYPE A POST CONTAINING A WARNING OF NON-COMPLIANCE ENTIRELY IN CAPS IS IN NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPPOSITELOCK NON-COMPLIANCE COUNCIL ARTICLE 767.B SUBSECTION MX.5 ENTITLED “NOTIFICATIONS OF NON-COMPLIANCE.” FAILURE TO CORRECT THIS WILL RESULT IN NON-COMPLIANCE.
![]() 12/03/2016 at 06:21 |
|
GIB!!
![]() 12/05/2016 at 03:31 |
|
Very wow