![]() 01/29/2016 at 13:43 • Filed to: Front Page Problems | ![]() | ![]() |
Excuse me while I get my popcorn and watch the rage ensue.....
![]() 01/29/2016 at 13:46 |
|
OpposaurusWRX does not approve of that crap
![]() 01/29/2016 at 13:54 |
|
hahaha wow and it’s got a super “shit stirring” title.
![]() 01/29/2016 at 13:55 |
|
But with the rear extenders in, it’s virtually identical to the STI. Let that sink in for a minute.
I stopped reading after that.
![]() 01/29/2016 at 13:57 |
|
Party Vi would be proud
![]() 01/29/2016 at 13:59 |
|
I’m disappointed so far. More tolerance than usual in the comments section. But there's plenty of time left, I'll have to remember to check back in.
![]() 01/29/2016 at 14:01 |
|
It’s mostly a “here’s a 2016 STi review but let me brag about my car to you”
![]() 01/29/2016 at 14:15 |
|
Remember ancient Chinese proverb: “He who stirs shit, taste spoon last.”
![]() 01/29/2016 at 14:20 |
|
That mismatched ill-fitting cap on the Baja makes me irrationally angry.
![]() 01/29/2016 at 14:22 |
|
He put “bagged” in the title so that cuts out a lot of rage. Still could look better but whatever, still looks safe to drive.
![]() 01/29/2016 at 14:22 |
|
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Bahahahahahaa.. No.
![]() 01/29/2016 at 14:23 |
|
Yeah, it’s really off putting.
![]() 01/29/2016 at 14:28 |
|
Atleast the author knows his audience. If he put the word stance in it, everyone would get mad, so might as well go out in a blaze of rustled jimmys
![]() 01/29/2016 at 14:32 |
|
http://jalopnik.com/is-this-a-2016…
![]() 01/29/2016 at 14:40 |
|
As long as it is safe to drive. That’s all I care about.
![]() 01/29/2016 at 20:41 |
|
Frontpage? (oh...I remember)