![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:00 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
So here is a challenge for you, Oppo: pick a car and explain how different the world of cars would be if said car did not exist. (and no you can’t pick the Benz Patent-Motorwagen and Ford Model T because that’s cheating).
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:02 |
|
Without the Tesla Roadster, we wouldn’t have the Tesla Model S, then we wouldn’t have such a surge of electric car production.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:09 |
|
OK then, how about the fardier à vapeur, built by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot in 1770.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:12 |
|
S2000 because the Ferrari 458 would be a lot different
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:16 |
|
I think it is pretty clear what the non-existence of this one would have caused.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:20 |
|
Without Lada we would have no Lada jokes.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:22 |
|
Miata, because without it the world would be a much sadder place,
But in all seriousness, we all know how it saved the fun british roadster formula from the brink of extinction. I’d also venture to say that the daily driver ‘fun for the masses’ segment would be very different...as in probably only pony cars or big money sports cars from Germany.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:23 |
|
I still think this thing not only got automakers to take chances on boring midsize sedan design, but also that only offering 4-cylinder engines in a family mover was acceptable as well as compromising the rear headroom for a 4-door coupe styling attempt. Equal design effort for all vehicle segments (look at midsize, compact, and subcompact econocars prior to 2010 when Fluidic Sculpture hit the roads). I think the industry was moving this way regardless, but the Sonata and Optima transformations just moved everything up substantially.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:31 |
|
There would be no Jalopnik
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:36 |
|
the original range rover. none of this high end, luxury sport SUV bullshit would be around.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:37 |
|
Because LS1
![]() 01/25/2016 at 11:48 |
|
Are you going to explain the significance of The Ferrari TheFerrari? Or do you want me to take a crack at it?
Without The Ferrari TheFerrari, some other car would be known as the car with the dumbest name ever.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 12:04 |
|
The 58/60 Lincoln Continental. Without it’s crazy design it is likely we never would have gotten the far more contemporary (and successful) 60s Continentals.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 12:18 |
|
The first Honda, because obviously.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 16:43 |
|
Knew that one was coming.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 16:44 |
|
This is an incredibly good answer.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 16:45 |
|
I applaud the fact that Hyundai showed the world that risks are ok, but living with a Sonata personally, the visibility is just awful compared to something like the Accord.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 16:46 |
|
That roof is just flat-out cool.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 16:47 |
|
I’m still struggling to figure out how the Roadster created any funding for the Model S.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 16:48 |
|
I’m probably gonna sound dumb but what car is that?
![]() 01/25/2016 at 16:48 |
|
1970: bro check out my hella tight CVCC
1990: bro check out my hella tight VTEC
![]() 01/25/2016 at 16:50 |
|
At least Range Rover still makes CUVs/crossovers/SUVs/cars/whatever the hell they’re called that can go offroad.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 16:50 |
|
Is it for the amount of horsepower per liter?
![]() 01/25/2016 at 16:51 |
|
This answer is a whole Lada bullcrap.
/s
sorry I had to make that pun
![]() 01/25/2016 at 17:02 |
|
The roadster put Tesla on the map. People knew what Tesla was, so they were more comfortable buying the Model S. The Model S becomes a smashing hit and now all car companies want a piece of that.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 17:03 |
|
Yeah
![]() 01/25/2016 at 17:04 |
|
Oh ok, makes sense. Thanks.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 17:36 |
|
The rear facing window goes down too just like a passenger window
![]() 01/25/2016 at 17:53 |
|
LADALADALADALADA CAN’T HEAR YOU
![]() 01/25/2016 at 18:24 |
|
*5th.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 18:45 |
|
1972-1984 Lancia Beta, legendary for horrible rust issues even by 1970s standards, it and the later Gamma killed Lancias reputation outside of Italy hard and therfore essentially doomed the brand to die a slow, agonizing death.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 18:49 |
|
Eh, its ridiculously understated compared to the shit Chrysler and GM were throwing at customers back then.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 18:50 |
|
What do you mean Lancia’s dying? Look at this magnificent machine!
![]() 01/25/2016 at 19:07 |
|
Uh, that was discontinued a couple years ago. Lancias current lineup consists of this
and this
![]() 01/25/2016 at 19:31 |
|
The Ypsilon just looks…special to say the least.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 19:37 |
|
This was the refined 60 model. The 58 was more whacky
![]() 01/25/2016 at 19:50 |
|
2010: bro check out my hella tight positive camber
![]() 01/25/2016 at 19:50 |
|
You get what I’m trying to say
![]() 01/25/2016 at 20:36 |
|
Without the Eagle we wouldn’t have the huge market that is today the crossover.
![]() 01/25/2016 at 20:44 |
|
Could be worse. Could have been the new Continental.