![]() 01/08/2016 at 21:22 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! I mean...it is 10% off.
![]() 01/08/2016 at 21:24 |
|
CP!
all the crack pipes!
![]() 01/08/2016 at 21:25 |
|
Does this watch make me money and/or food? No? CP
![]() 01/08/2016 at 21:28 |
|
It will help your social life. You can show up that prick Jameson who always has to flash his plebeian Automatic Grand Seiko in your face every time you see him.
![]() 01/08/2016 at 21:29 |
|
CP. Also, it’s an ugly watch.
![]() 01/08/2016 at 21:32 |
|
That’s clearly an Acura. Get your facts straight, incompetent.
![]() 01/08/2016 at 21:40 |
|
Well it’s ugly as shit but free shipping so I’ll allow it.
![]() 01/08/2016 at 21:57 |
|
Audemars Piguet are so 2015. No wonder it’s so cheap.
![]() 01/08/2016 at 22:15 |
|
Whenever I read about Audemars Piguet it’s always some fucking gaudy, glittery turd ·that’s worth more than my house.
These guys make some beautiful watches, though:
![]() 01/09/2016 at 00:29 |
|
NP because something that absurdly pimp deserves an insane price.
![]() 01/09/2016 at 03:58 |
|
Until Jameson shows up with a Patek.
![]() 01/10/2016 at 20:34 |
|
Well thats not an accurate example from PS9, but yeah Audemars Piquet and Patek Philippe are steep priced. But they are the last few companies that have in-house movements (unlike the thousands of other watch makers) so its warranted.
![]() 01/10/2016 at 21:15 |
|
Not accurate? What do you mean?
![]() 01/11/2016 at 21:00 |
|
I just meant not all of their boutique watches cost a million dollars. Its more like watches like these are $60,000+. :P Seems more afforable, no?
![]() 01/11/2016 at 22:02 |
|
That isn’t a failure in accuracy, though. No one made the claim that this one watch was all they sell.