"No, I don't thank you for the fish at all" (notindetroit)
09/06/2015 at 18:28 • Filed to: torchinsky, jaguar xe review
2
3|
"No, I don't thank you for the fish at all" (notindetroit)
09/06/2015 at 18:28 • Filed to: torchinsky, jaguar xe review | 2
| 3 |
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! That means Jalopnik will soon have its turn at what is perhaps the most anticipated four-door sedan in Jaguar’s entire history.
HOWEVER , one must remember the, uh, !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! . And how Jason said that he’ll knock off 10 points from the review every time he’s had to relive that memory. It’s right there, in plain language, at the very bottom of the launch report. And it just so happens that I’ve already taken the courtesy of !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
So I now eagerly await a Jalopnik first - the first review to score a perfect zero, even before the review car ever arrives on our shores.
You’re welcome, Torch!
Cé hé sin
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
09/06/2015 at 18:39 |
|
There’ve actually been reviews of the XE since July...
Wobbles the Mind
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
09/06/2015 at 18:39 |
|
Twist: Jaguar XE scores a zero because nothing is purrfect.
djmt1
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
09/06/2015 at 18:52 |
|
I don’t know how to break this to you but...
Jalopnik don’t give scores for reviews anymore.