"BKosher84" (bkosher84)
07/17/2015 at 08:15 • Filed to: None
2
23|
"BKosher84" (bkosher84)
07/17/2015 at 08:15 • Filed to: None | 2
| 23 |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
I actually hope Gawker gets sued into oblivion for this... This article is because Gawker hates Reddit for some random unknown reason.. Fuck this place man.. Fuck it to hell... I hope Jordan Sargent/HamNo loose their jobs and never works in media again...
SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 08:16 |
|
Yeah, this is disgusting.
TheBaron2112
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 08:18 |
|
*lose their jobs. Outrage only works if we’re articulate and spell things properly. It leaves fewer things to criticise from the opposition.
Berang
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 08:20 |
|
I see a few possibilities. Gawker tells everybody with any taste whatsoever “suck my balls im always the coolest!” 0r they apologize, fire Sargent, and conveniently forget that even though he wrote it they still put it on their site, or in combination with one of the above they get their pants sued off.
pip bip - choose Corrour
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 08:21 |
|
where is the “news” in that article?
so some married guy wants to have sex with a gay porn star.
who cares?
i’ve clearly missed something.
|
BKosher84
> TheBaron2112
07/17/2015 at 08:21 |
|
I had lose there at first.. But changed it right before I clicked publish.. Give me a break grammar nazi..
georgechristensen
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 08:29 |
|
Hulkamania soon
TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 08:29 |
|
Jordan Sargent occupys the same level as Piers Morgan now. What a fucking scumbag.
|
TheBaron2112
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 08:29 |
|
People that want to destroy your argument will not give you a pass on low hanging fruit. Just FYI for the future of Internet Arguments. :P
|
SidewaysOnDirt still misses Bowie
> TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
07/17/2015 at 08:30 |
|
Hopefully he’ll get into a fracas with Clarkson next.
SnapUndersteer, Italian Spiderman
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 08:33 |
|
It’s not a grammatical error though. It seems to be a spelling error
spanfucker retire bitch
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 08:36 |
|
Just don’t forget guys, posting those leaked celebrity images makes you a morally repugnant scum sucker of humanity (it kind of does when you post them). But this? This is perfectly alright. Journalism even!
Oh Gawker. You despicable, hypocritical fucks. Don’t ever change. Then I wouldn’t have a focus for all of my hatred at the modern day tabloid.
GhostZ
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 09:01 |
|
What does this article have to do with Reddit?
Funktheduck
> TheBaron2112
07/17/2015 at 09:03 |
|
I used anti-evolutionists yesterday on Kotaku because I wanted to be broader than just creationists and I wanted to avoid a religious argument. Didn't work. The internet gets what the Internet wants.
|
Funktheduck
> pip bip - choose Corrour
07/17/2015 at 09:05 |
|
It's because he's linked to Conde Nast and they used to own reddit. Gawker hates reddit despite getting most of their posts from said site.
|
pip bip - choose Corrour
> Funktheduck
07/17/2015 at 09:06 |
|
ah , thank you
NOW it makes some kind of sense.
|
Funktheduck
> pip bip - choose Corrour
07/17/2015 at 09:11 |
|
They’ve really done an awful thing and possibly criminal if one commenter is to be believed. They claim to be equal rights, especially for the LGBTQ community, and then participate in a very public forced outing of a man who we don’t know anything about in his personal life. He’s not a public figure and even if he was his sexuality is no body’s business but his. It's amazing how far people will go for clicks.
|
BKosher84
> GhostZ
07/17/2015 at 09:17 |
|
Gawker for the past week and half or so has been running posts about how Reddit has ousted it’s previous CEO and whatnot and Conde Nast owns Reddit. That’s the connection I’m making at least.
nermal
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 09:23 |
|
Oh no! They definitely won’t have any $$$ left for the Hulkster after this guy destroys them legally and financially.
Sneaky Pete
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 09:33 |
|
Careful stretching that far, you might pull something.
Sweet Trav
> BKosher84
07/17/2015 at 09:33 |
|
Truth is always a defense against defamation/slander. If he did what they say he did, Gawker is in the clear.
PatBateman
> Berang
07/17/2015 at 10:02 |
|
This came from above Sargent. He might have written the blog, but I’ll bet my left nut that it was green lit/approved by someone much much higher up.
RockThrillz89
> nermal
07/17/2015 at 10:36 |
|
I wish I had photoshop skills. Needs a Hulk bandana, the beard, and Gawker money floating down. They picture you posted is perfect and immediately made me think of this.
|
BKosher84
> Sneaky Pete
07/17/2015 at 11:14 |
|
http://gawker.com/or-conspiracy-…
I’m not the only one that saw the link... It’s isn’t a stretch at all.. Gawker has, with the past two weeks have had a massive hard-on for bashing Reddit/Conde Nast and anything associated with the two.