![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:09 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Is a reliable 6 mbps adequate for a high quality 720p video stream?
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:12 |
|
some
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:13 |
|
Probably, most 720p is encoded between 4 and 8 mbps.
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:14 |
|
It’ll work, but you may get some lag and probably can’t do anything else while watching.
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:15 |
|
Should be fine, may need to pause a little at the beginning to let it load a bit but should be alright.
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:18 |
|
I’m okay with that. I’m paying the bill and everyone else can lump it.
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:24 |
|
What I would do if you have a router, limit your port to the Netflix or streaming when you watch. That way they can’t do anything else; otherwise the router will try to prioritize, but won’t be perfect and could give you lag that way too.
http://www.tested.com/tech/2175-how-…
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:25 |
|
Uncompressed, 720p is something like 120MBytes per second. You’re looking at some kind of compressed stream, and the question is how much compression is acceptable - or, if you’re not streaming, what kind of compression has been used.
Most web-streaming uses H.264: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264/MPE…
There are different levels of compression which can be applied with it, but Youtube’s 720p is 2.5Mbits/s and that’s pretty typical. So if you’re getting a reliable 4+mb/s connection, you ought to be fine.
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:28 |
|
I have a sophisticated router — that I understand but little — but I can probably shape the traffic to prioritize certain MAC addresses...
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:30 |
|
This is precisely what I was hoping.
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:34 |
|
I don’t know what the upstream speed is. Uverse promises 6 mbps down and their claim is that the bandwidth is fibre-delivered and guaranteed. My theory is that a solid 6 megabits ought to be adequate for most things. And 720p streams are more than adequate image quality for my needs. (I had an analog television up until a month ago; a 35-inch Sony WEGA Trinitron, which was a fantastic television. I bought a used Panasonic 52-inch plasma for $200 with the mount. 720p is looking FAB right now.)
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:36 |
|
That’d probably be your best bet, just kick them all off and limit to one MAC address or throttle everyone haha. You could be the TWC of your home.
![]() 06/25/2015 at 15:40 |
|
Sounds like fun, actually...
![]() 06/25/2015 at 16:10 |
|
I didn’t mention upstream - you replied to me twice, so maybe one was misdirected?
If it’s fibre, then 6Mbits should be rock solid at 5.9-6.1 (maybe even a tad higher if you’re lucky). I have fibre and it’s great, although UK internet’s a completely different market - I pay something like £25 a month for a connection that’s fast enough I’m not sure what they’re actually giving me these days - I think 40-50Mbits, maybe only 30, but whatever it is, it’s faster than my wireless router. I reliably get 2 MBytes/s sitting in bed, so that does me - it means a typical TV series episode will download completely in under 5 minutes, for example.
At 6Mbits/s you’re going to notice download times a lot more, because you’re much closer to the bandwidth per second of the compressed video. There’s something to be said for it if you can pay a little extra and get much faster speeds from your fibre provider. If it’s a big increase, though, you ought to be fine with streaming or downloading in advance - after all, a bit of extra hard disk space doesn’t cost much.
![]() 06/25/2015 at 23:10 |
|
Depends on the codec. H.264, you’re golden. MPEG-2, you’re gonna have a bad time.
Luckily, nearly everyone uses H.264 these days. The only reason I have any MPEG-2 on my network is because most TVs (without a set top box) don’t grok H.264 and I HAVE to have MPEG-2 that then gets modulated onto the RF distribution network.
As a comparison, coming straight off the satellite H.264, a typical DirecTV channel is around 5 Mbps @ 1080i. That same channel transcoded to MPEG-2 is 15 Mbps.
![]() 06/26/2015 at 01:39 |
|
You swam my head with that reply but I think I get the drift.