NPoCP?

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 04/06/2015 at 14:21 • Filed to: None

1

5

It would appear that my !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! , the first car I really have any memory of, has come up for sale about two hours away from us. I can't be sure it's hers, but there's only so many of these things around and this one is identical in ever conceivable way. Even has the optional rear-facing 3rd row, although at some point they managed to loose 3 of the 4 center caps.

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

This car brings back memories, even if it isn't the same one. W/O knowing the vin, the only discrepancy I can find is that it's listed as one owner, and we bought ours off lease.

Vicente Esteve > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/06/2015 at 14:32

1

This is all too awesome.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Vicente Esteve 04/06/2015 at 14:32

0

My mom was never into the whole Highlander scene.

Vicente Esteve > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/06/2015 at 14:34

0

Further explain please.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Vicente Esteve 04/06/2015 at 14:37

1

She hates minivans, and is only sort of okay with SUVs. She had a Trooper when I was first born, and was going to trade it in on a red P38 Range Rover, but the salesman/my dad said this would be more fun to drive, more reliable, and easier to get kid seats in & out of. They were right.

jkm7680 > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/06/2015 at 16:34

1

NP, the 2.8 is also ultra reliable.