![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:11 • Filed to: around worklopnik | ![]() | ![]() |
Customer just purchased a 2006 CL65 AMG from our used car section. $33,990
I say CP but that's just my opinion. $22K is a better number for one of these imo.
Next, Mercedes-Benz is slacking. (bad photo below)
Quick fault list:
-Fake vents on both sides
-Only the passenger side air dam in real
-The very bottom of the front bumper has a chrome trim (will get scratched a trillion times)
-Seat leather fading
-Lots of other cheapness touches Merc has been doing lately all while still being very expensive
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:13 |
|
the CL65 rolling on Tire Rack clearance sale?
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:16 |
|
So, you are expecting this back like Monday morning right?
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:16 |
|
seems like it lol
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:17 |
|
oh yes lol :] Usually after they take it to an independent shop and it gets towed here in pieces for us to finish the job lol
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:22 |
|
Star Motor Cars? I used to live in Houston. Land of expensive rides rolling on cheap rims. And cheap rides rolling on expensive rims.
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:23 |
|
100% true story :]
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:25 |
|
If you had told me that you could buy a 600HP luxury coupe wit ha 190MPH limited top speed for $22k a decade ago, I would have called you nuts.
Then again, upkeep and repairs on the CL65 AMG is really bad, isn't it?
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:26 |
|
fake vents are seriously the worst
it's literally there just to lie to you
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:26 |
|
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:27 |
|
Those wheels are not good.
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:28 |
|
exactly
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:35 |
|
You can do the work at home, but parts are a bitch
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:43 |
|
$22k at auction, maybe. I'm playing around on cars.com to see what's up. I'm seeing the cheapest of the CL65s at $28k. Maybe I'm looking in the wrong spot.
There are some of the supercharged CL55s for as little as $15k.
![]() 02/10/2015 at 17:51 |
|
One of the best modern Mercedes bodies imo, not with those wheels of course. I think your right about it being $10k too much.
![]() 02/10/2015 at 18:14 |
|
I don't think Mid-2000's Mercs have aged well at all either.
Though it still blows me away how much the biturbo V12's have depreciated.
That's over %80 in 9 years.
![]() 02/10/2015 at 18:18 |
|
80% is crazy huh? But exactly why, I am not sure
![]() 02/10/2015 at 18:41 |
|
Damn E400 coupe?
![]() 02/10/2015 at 18:43 |
|
Aerodynamics, have you learned nothing from the FiST?
![]() 02/10/2015 at 18:48 |
|
They haven't! Go to any of the salt states. A very large chunk of Mercs from the DaimlerChrysler era ALL have some sort of rust peppered on them...Even the more recent models...
![]() 02/10/2015 at 19:00 |
|
Edmunds.com just finished up a long term (1-year) roadtest with a 2005 AMG CL65. What a nightmare! The constant oil consumption and So so so many costly repairs to the engine and suspension. Good Lord! Edmunds.com 2005 AMG CL65 year of ownership.
![]() 02/10/2015 at 19:05 |
|
but it doesn't mean I like it
![]() 02/10/2015 at 19:10 |
|
But imagine how they'd look with just 1 vent, or no vents. It'd look horrible.
![]() 02/10/2015 at 19:23 |
|
but this merc has fake vents on BOTH SIDES
pointlesssss
![]() 02/10/2015 at 19:30 |
|
True. I honestly believe the worst offender are hood scoops that don't actually function since I believe that increases drag.
![]() 02/10/2015 at 19:32 |
|
preach
![]() 02/10/2015 at 19:56 |
|
Well, that's not an entirely accurate. They were quoted $16,751 for a series of issues, but ended up narrowing down the problems and it "only" cost them $4600.
http://www.edmunds.com/mercedes-benz/…
![]() 02/10/2015 at 21:58 |
|
I like the front. Just not a huge fan of the tail lights
![]() 02/11/2015 at 02:28 |
|
It's really more like 40% when you factor in the repairs and maintenance it will need as soon as you buy it.