![]() 12/02/2015 at 21:55 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Okay there’s really nothing exciting about this picture. I went to my local camera store and found a lens I wanted. It was a Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6, but this one has VR. My old one doesn’t. It also focuses way faster. Cool! But it has one less ED element. Eh. I took it outside so I could take some test shots of things and started shooting cars as they drove by. Honestly the most interesting car during the time I was shooting was a silver Accord. What does that say about my area? We know responsibility?
![]() 12/02/2015 at 22:55 |
|
That is probably the most artsy photo of a 2006 or 2007 Accord (with a family inside) that I’ve ever seen.
![]() 12/02/2015 at 22:59 |
|
The facelift worked wonders on the sedan, but the coupe looks horrendous. I’m glad I have a pre-facelift coupe.
Also that’s a V6 model. 244 horsepower. Nice.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 00:55 |
|
Hey! I have the same lens! I got this pic with it going 75mph from the passengers seat of my friend’s Boxster!
![]() 12/03/2015 at 10:23 |
|
I see you were shooting at ISO 2000. What body where you shooting with? I can’t shoot that high of ISO without lots of noise, but I’m also just shooting with a D3300. Cool pic, yo.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 10:30 |
|
It’s probably only artsy because there’s a watermark on it. I thought it was kind of a neat photo on it’s own. Almost stock-photo looking. Yes, it has it’s flaws, but I thought it was still cool. I threw the watermark on because from time to time, I’ll see my photos popping up on parts of the internet with no credit; enter the watermark. Other times I’ll see the watermark cropped out. Awesome.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 13:39 |
|
I use a Nikon D300, its an older body but still works well.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 16:20 |
|
That’s what I was meaning, like stock photo looking.
![]() 12/03/2015 at 16:25 |
|
Indeed it does.