![]() 10/13/2015 at 10:39 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 10/13/2015 at 10:52 |
|
Looks NP to me, though I’d like to call a CFD guy to see what’s gonna happen if the rectangular bit on the sidepod is removed, a la 2009 F1 cars.
I might also try out wider rear wings, a newer-styled front wing and a double diffuser. Question is... who’s got some CFD?
![]() 10/13/2015 at 11:04 |
|
Removing rectangular bits increases chances of rear-end instability due to outside influences, particularly on corner-entry.
I think what makes it NP is that is comes with a working engine, nevermind the fact that you’ll probably have to cultivate a personal relationship with someone at Cosworth to run it. Most cars like this are sold as rolling chassis.
![]() 10/13/2015 at 11:13 |
|
Ah, I see. That’s good to know.
But boy I’d rip the Cossie XFE for a proper DFV. Or a VTEC Honda (?).
![]() 10/13/2015 at 11:16 |
|
I wonder what class that would be in autocross?
![]() 10/13/2015 at 12:40 |
|
Awesome car. Connor Daly posted some videos of this car running a few weeks back. Wish I could have it.
![]() 10/13/2015 at 15:57 |
|
Terrible. The aero is designed for speeds much higher than seen on an autocross course, wouldn’t be much of a help.
![]() 10/13/2015 at 16:01 |
|
Have you done aero development before?
![]() 10/13/2015 at 17:16 |
|
Those big-ass slick tires would still work pretty well though.
![]() 10/13/2015 at 17:47 |
|
I don’t think so, not sure they’d ever get anywhere near operating temperature. I honestly think a good set of Falkens would work better on an autocross than these slicks would, they’re simply not designed to go slow.
![]() 10/13/2015 at 23:41 |
|
Hell if I know, but fuggit.
![]() 11/02/2015 at 21:18 |
|
So what this means is that we won’t swap a LS/LT motor in it?