![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:19 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
So I realized with the 328i become the 330i with its 2.0L TT engine. And the 335i becoming the 340i with its 3.0L TT engine. The 320i right now with its 2.0L engine and its proper name will have to be made wrong into the 310i.
![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:21 |
|
lol
if they were going to change it and didn't want to use displacement like the old days then why not use HP?
this is all lame
![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:26 |
|
320i
320is
330i
DONE.
![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:26 |
|
I was trying to come up with some ridiculous math joke about how they arrived at their new naming, but I gave up.
![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:26 |
|
They could've called it the 340 and 360.
Cylinder counts bro.
We could then have a 712.
Wat.
![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:27 |
|
I'm sorry sir, that's too sensible.
-BMW Executive
![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:28 |
|
I guess the number 20 is too plebeian. Now, not only do 3s turn into 5s, but the larger numbers also carry over.
![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:35 |
|
This kind of logic? On a modern BMW? You sir, are crazy.
![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:37 |
|
I'll never understand why internet commenters care so much about what naming scheme BMW is using
![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:42 |
|
That would be awesome.
That would give us an 812 if the 8 Series made a comeback.
![]() 07/10/2014 at 20:45 |
|
Oh no, first time I've made a comment on this. I didn't really care about it when I saw the article this morning until I remembered we had a 320i.
![]() 07/11/2014 at 06:41 |
|
Only issue is that all North American market "is" models have been coupes or convertibles. Though I think everyone's quite okay with the 320is BMW did sell at one point (even if the current "328" would be a sad substitute).
![]() 07/11/2014 at 11:10 |
|
I think it's because car people are logical people. It doesn't make logical sense in their naming scheme based on what the numbers normally could be interpreted as. It makes our brains hurt to try to keep this straight. Pre 2005ish BMW's were able to to see what the engine size was by the model. Post 2006ish, they started using the numbers to mean different things, now they are using the numbers to mean yet something else. It's a matter of car buffs trying to keep the info straight in thier head.
![]() 07/11/2014 at 11:24 |
|
The thing is, this isn't new. The displacement hasn't always been a perfect match to the badge even going as far back as the 1980s.