"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
06/03/2014 at 11:35 • Filed to: None
4
5|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
06/03/2014 at 11:35 • Filed to: None | 4
| 5 |
One is a beautiful work of automotive art, with sleek flowing lines and a dignified, classy air to it. The other is an ugly old Jaguar sedan.
Just kidding.
HammerheadFistpunch
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/03/2014 at 11:40 |
|
That's easy; one is a Mark Ten, the other is a Taurus.
OPPOsaurus WRX
> HammerheadFistpunch
06/03/2014 at 11:46 |
|
I had to look it up to make sure so don't feel too bad but its actually an Edge.
|
HammerheadFistpunch
> OPPOsaurus WRX
06/03/2014 at 11:52 |
|
oh I know, it was a subtle joke that it doesn't really matter what Ford it is with this stupid naming scheme
|
OPPOsaurus WRX
> HammerheadFistpunch
06/03/2014 at 11:55 |
|
Yea its pretty bad when, I, as someone who does like Lincoln (or at least what Lincoln could be) doesn't know the naming scheme, it might be time for them to rethink their method.
BiTurbo228 - Dr Frankenstein of Spitfires
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
06/03/2014 at 12:55 |
|
When you see Series XJs next to these it really makes you see how lithe of a figure the XJ has. It looks like a dancer next to a chef.
Not that I would kick either out of bed mind you...