![]() 04/19/2014 at 10:28 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
The writing in this !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! mcompletely kills the auto nut inside me. It has to be the most detached, uninformed automotive writing I've ever encountered. Another reason to avoid click-bait sites like this and BuzzFeed.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
"The massive 5.5-liter V8 engine is snuggled down into the square hood, allowing the vehicle to go from zero to 60 mph in six seconds."
Nothing like a snuggled engine.
Sidenote: What the hell is a
Soleil Anadi?
![]() 04/19/2014 at 10:31 |
|
I got the rather Chrome extension to filter out all the clickbait and baby pictures from my facebook feed and replace them with cat pictures. Much improved.
![]() 04/19/2014 at 10:37 |
|
"Massive 5.5 liter"
Also, zero to 60 in six = fast: wat
![]() 04/19/2014 at 10:38 |
|
I suggest you read the "article" as it's full of wtf-moments
![]() 04/19/2014 at 10:47 |
|
"Running boards"
"Running boards" "span from fender to fender"... * SHOWS BRUSH GUARD*
Further, it's a good thing Saleen makes high performance vehicles founded in '93. Imagine if they made vehicles founded at some other time. But wait, wasn't the Mustang founded in '64?
After long litany of cars some of which are likely *not* among the most expensive,
->insert $3k electric bike<-
WAT
As a whole, I have to say, "English, motherfucker - do you speak it?"/"Bro, do you even literate?"
![]() 04/19/2014 at 13:21 |
|
Literally just saw that car in person. Was not impressed.
![]() 04/19/2014 at 13:40 |
|
What is it? It looks faintly like a re-bodied Corvette
![]() 04/19/2014 at 13:41 |
|
It is: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/18/aut…
![]() 04/19/2014 at 14:05 |
|
No idea, didn't even stop to look at it.
![]() 04/19/2014 at 14:06 |
|
So they just ruined a Corvette.
![]() 04/19/2014 at 14:09 |
|
Completely. They amped up the engine a bit, but put tacky leather and horrendous wood (90s entertainment center-esque) all over it. Says it's a t-top though, which I like.
![]() 04/19/2014 at 14:47 |
|
Exactly