![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:17 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! ?
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Nothing makes sense anymore. If it doesn't pull off a W123 miracle, I... I don't...
I can't...
...
...Please help.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:20 |
|
Go anywhere SUV with a wonderful 4.0 straight 6, or a 90s Japanese econobox? This shouldn't be a hard question to answer!
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:23 |
|
I think many of these odd eliminations are due to people mistaking "ultimate beater" for "most desirable". Age demographics and actually having no idea what makes a great beater also play into it.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:23 |
|
For the life of me I don't know either. I know and see far more bombed out XJs than I do Imprezas.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:26 |
|
Impreza is awesome. XJ is still cool but not as cool.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:26 |
|
Because the general populace sees "Impreza" and automatically thinks WRX/STi.
I haven't voted for the Impreza, just like I haven't voted for the E36 or the Jetta.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:26 |
|
2.5 RS
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:28 |
|
JDM yo
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:28 |
|
Preface: Not starting shit. And I love Subies.
But I gotta know- what makes it better transportation than an XJ? Coolness aside.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:29 |
|
WUT
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:53 |
|
They're both good in their own way. I'd rather have the Impreza because I can hoon the Impreza more than the Jeep. I had a 94 Grand Cherokee Limited with a V8 in it for a number of years. I'd rather have the Impreza unless I needed to haul something.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:58 |
|
Cherokee 4.0 is faster, leaks less oil, and is more reliable.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 15:59 |
|
You realize that the 4.0 Cherokee is faster, more reliable, and better off-road. So it's superior in hoonage.
And you're talking about the ZJ Grand Cherokee, not the XJ Cherokee. Totally different beasts.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 16:02 |
|
Like a true Chicagoan, I've voted for the Jeep 4 times, as well as the Fox-body.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 16:05 |
|
Still doesn't explain the Mk3 Jetta beating the Mazda MX-3.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 16:07 |
|
You're right. To me this one makes sense. I might be more inclined to fix up an MX-3 and just run the Jetta over curbs and into the ground.
![]() 03/27/2014 at 16:15 |
|
Wait... Did you just try to tell me a Cherokee is faster? Its not. It might be quicker in a short range of acceleration. You still couldn't give me a shit Cherokee. You could sell me a shit 2.5 RS for a couple thowe
![]() 03/27/2014 at 17:31 |
|
You can fix an XJ with bailing wire and Twizzlers. That's a great beater.