What happened to the mobile images?

"Arch Duke Maxyenko, Shit Talk Extraordinaire" (arch-duke-maxyenko) 03/25/2014 at 19:09 • Filed to: Kinja

6

5

Did they dry up
like raisins in the sun?
Or fester like a sore—
And then run?
Do they stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over—
like a syrupy sweet?

Maybe they just sag
like a heavy load.

Or did they explode?

Blondude > Arch Duke Maxyenko, Shit Talk Extraordinaire 03/25/2014 at 19:16

1

Yes.

TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts. > Arch Duke Maxyenko, Shit Talk Extraordinaire 03/25/2014 at 19:47

1

The kinjda dumbas... I mean developers decided that it's 2004 and we're all on 2G phones so they removed them to improve "webpage load times".

Arch Duke Maxyenko, Shit Talk Extraordinaire > TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts. 03/25/2014 at 19:51

0

Thanks, Denton.

SPNKiX > Arch Duke Maxyenko, Shit Talk Extraordinaire 03/25/2014 at 20:18

2

This is a really big deal to me, actually. I generally find posts by looking at the pictures and have found that I spend almost 50% less time on the site since they got rid of mobile images. When someone titles their post "Wat da?" and there is a pic of a Lamborghini prototype right there, you click. When someone titles their post "Wat da?" and there's no image, why bother?

I even have a bunch of posts I want to do of cars I've seen around town and just don't feel like it anymore. I don't even feel like posting a complaint, like you have here, because I am just under the line of motivation to make it happen. Complaining in a comment, I can do, though. Thanks for the oppo-rtunity.

Luken10 > SPNKiX 03/26/2014 at 04:48

0

I feel exactly the same way. I find myself on here way less often without all of the accompanying photos.