![]() 03/24/2014 at 10:50 • Filed to: stanceworks, audi, audi 50 | ![]() | ![]() |
Such a beautiful little car. I'd love to own one of these...especially with an upgraded powerplant.
Full story: !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! .
![]() 03/24/2014 at 10:55 |
|
you dont want to know how much a decent stock one goes for in Europe these days... 8-10K Euros
![]() 03/24/2014 at 10:59 |
|
If you ever buy one, make sure you swap the engine... Those things are DEAD SLOW... I owned a Polo (same car different name) with the 0.9 litre, I could almost hit 60mph if I was going downhill and the car was homesick.
But I still loved it. Pea green with orange/burnt sienna interior :)
![]() 03/24/2014 at 11:01 |
|
Ballsy posting something from stanceworks around these parts.
With that said, that is a pretty looking car
![]() 03/24/2014 at 11:05 |
|
Well, it's an interesting and beautiful car. The stance doesn't exactly improve the look but I guess you could/should look beyond that.
![]() 03/24/2014 at 11:08 |
|
I'm actually in the "stance done right looks good" club. Now, whatever that actually means-that is open for interpretation. If a car is going to sit low I'd like it to look like this.
![]() 03/24/2014 at 11:11 |
|
There was a nice Audi 80 at Katie's C&C on Sat.
Red interior, really liked the looks of it.
![]() 03/24/2014 at 11:22 |
|
They're really rare though. Quite unlike the mk2 Polo, which is still relatively plentiful and still dirt cheap. And probably much more durable, although not as charming.
![]() 03/24/2014 at 11:23 |
|
That is one clean engine bay.
![]() 03/24/2014 at 11:24 |
|
I had a MK1 Polo ten years ago.. it was a shitbox (but I loved it), can't even remember if I sold it or scrapped it, and I KNOW that I don't want to know how much it'd be worth today :P
![]() 03/24/2014 at 13:53 |
|
Right? I'd love to do something like that with the 244, but I have no idea where to start.
![]() 03/24/2014 at 13:54 |
|
Haha, I know. I found out earlier that this car was resold middle of last year for about 16,500 in CA. :(
![]() 03/24/2014 at 13:55 |
|
Haha, I post a lot of their stuff; I don't always like how it sits (disclaimer: I like stance to a point), but I appreciate the effort and how crazy clean most of these cars are.
![]() 03/24/2014 at 13:56 |
|
Haha, I figured as much. As soon as it said 60hp was the "peppier" trim, I knew it'd be slow as shit. Not sure what would fit in there, though. Engine bay looks pretty small, and I imagine much bigger would make the weight distribution look interesting.
![]() 03/24/2014 at 13:56 |
|
Damnit. I was out of the state; I'll definitely be back this coming weekend though.
![]() 03/24/2014 at 13:57 |
|
Side note: what color exterior?
![]() 03/24/2014 at 13:59 |
|
You can put a KR engine from a MK2 Golf GTi 16v in there quite easy... 140ish HP from the factory..
![]() 03/24/2014 at 14:00 |
|
Really nice car, It was black, I'll do a photo dump around 4:00. V12 Zagato was there also.
I've got a bunch of pictures of it.
![]() 03/24/2014 at 14:37 |
|
I agree with you there! It helps they have an eye for car photography too
![]() 03/24/2014 at 21:21 |
|
Ah, presuming the car's as light as a small hatch from that era should be, 60 horsepower will do. It should be able to do 80-90 on the motorway, and accelerate at a decent enough pace to hit the speed limit before the end of the slip road. Much as I'd like some more power, my 60HP hatch - okay, 59 when new, and it certainly isn't that anymore - does the job.