![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:16 • Filed to: wtf | ![]() | ![]() |
My brain is absolutely full of fuck.
I know this is more Jez/GT material, but I'm not brave enough to venture there.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:20 |
|
PIV
Particle Image Velocimetry?
Peak Inverse Voltage?
Parent Internet Viewer?
Sorry, I don't speak crazy bitch.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:21 |
|
oh lord
i couldn't get past the first paragraph
wtf
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:21 |
|
Penis in vagina.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:23 |
|
.../.I didnt even bother reading the who thing, but, really? are there people so stuck up their own ass that they write shit like this?
its must be satire. its cant possibly be anything else. on one is that stupid or crazy.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:23 |
|
Shhhhhh. jezebel is right over there>>>>>>
don't give them any more amm0.
Really, though. There is so much fucking wrong with the whole diatribe, it's pathetic. That is one paranoid woman.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:23 |
|
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:24 |
|
So she's willing to throw around the word rape like it's going out of style, but spelling out "penis in vagina" makes her blush?
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:25 |
|
Whaaaat.
The comments on the blog post are even funnier.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:26 |
|
So I read through the whole thing. There's a plot twist in the middle where it goes from stupid to insanely stupid. This isn't feminism, it's just an attempt at pulling for strings.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:27 |
|
Precious
Bodily
Fluids
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:27 |
|
Yeah that's a load of crap.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:28 |
|
I should say that this isn't feminist, this is just a crazy person.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:28 |
|
I came here after the first paragraph, because this is serious crazy. Consensual sex is rape? Okay crazy lady....
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:29 |
|
I do not think the author understands how sex is supposed to work.
If penetration and ejaculation aren't necessary for conception, how exactly do we have any ancestors? I'm pretty sure artifical ensemination is a rather recent development. And clearly our forebearers have been "doing it" wrong for millennia.
But of course I wouldn't understand that I'm wrong. I have a penis. I'm inherently evil.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:29 |
|
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:29 |
|
She's clearly off her rocker.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:30 |
|
She probably prefers the turkey baster method.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:32 |
|
Ok this women is crazy. Bitch the only reason you're here is because of intercourse or PIV. Your saying people should not reproduce? While in some cases that may be a beneficial thing for society, it is natural, and uhmm ITS HOW YOU WERE MADE! Also, sex is harmful and only men commit rape? Uhmm please explain sluts to me then. Also, what about this rape case?
http://www.askmen.com/dating/love_ti…
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:33 |
|
I can't believe not a single comment disagreed with her!
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:33 |
|
Like seriously, what the hell? This logic makes no sense to me.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:34 |
|
Okay, i read the whole thing, and a few comments.
This is the dumbest god damn waste of internet megabytes ever. There are people arguing that sex is unnatural. All of it. Even for purposes of reproduction.
ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS? THE NATURAL PROCESS OF REPRODUCTION IS UNNATURAL?!?!
MY BRAIN HURTS CAUSE OF TEH STUPID
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:35 |
|
It's been a good few minutes since I read that 'article' and my face is still stuck in the 'Whaaaa...?' position.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:36 |
|
I can't even put together a comprehensible sentence because the first paragraph and all of the comments left me "...wwhhaaa...I mean... Howww...?... The Fuuhhh.... ?..."
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:36 |
|
There's no logic involved there. None whatsoever.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:37 |
|
Good point.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:37 |
|
The worst part is if these women saw our reactions, they would say it has something to do with being men and forcing our will on them...
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:38 |
|
We're so evil. :(
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:40 |
|
This is why men have come to conclude women are crazy....irrefutable evidence.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:41 |
|
She seems too assuming about dudes. I don't really get her points of it being horrible when it makes, y'know, babies.
Some of the comments have SOME sense to say it's necessary for childbirth.
Still funny though.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:42 |
|
I wonder if she know's 99% of women think she's a full-blown crazy. I mean seriously, it astounds me someone would think any of that diatribe is true. What paranoia!
On the other hand, I'm going to go cry in the corner because I'm a prolific serial rapist.
"I'll take the rapist for $200 Alex"
"Thats "therapist" Mr. Connery"
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:43 |
|
Well I for one hope she never has sex/intercourse/PIV or what ever the hell she wants to call it as I'd hate to think that she would get pregnant and raise another generation to be like her with ridiculous clap-trap she's spouting to get attention from others in her meagre existence.
I'm sorry if that was a little harsh but seriously what a stupid individual.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:44 |
|
I may have found the authors...
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:46 |
|
WHAT???!
(Yes, I share the same reaction as you)
I just read that whole post (and parts of some comments)...
Literally the most absurd I've ever read in my life.
I have not the slightest idea of how ANYBODY can come to think those things that the author thinks. It makes approximately zero percent sense biologically, socially, and logically.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:46 |
|
Yeesh, sounds like she needs to get laid. However she chooses to have that happen, that is
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:48 |
|
Oh dear, oh dear oh dear.
I've just read a few of the comments below her, erm, er, article, I'll call it an article.
Its scary to read what she's said but there are others who think her way also.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:48 |
|
YES. Immediately thought of this haha!
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:49 |
|
radical wind. somewhere some lady might need some sort of get up & go. i spew radical wind all over oppo. the whole RWD>FWD thing, is just my topic i take a heavily biased one sided stand. (i'll never admit it, but i yearn for a fwd shitbox. the worse of the worse, riced, stanced...etc.) the few sentences i waded into made a valid point, if there's p in the v, and the v doesn't want the p, then it's rape. as simple as possible. the unpleasurable nonsense is like me bitching about understeer and gear ratio's. it sounds asinine because it is, a good alignment, proper tire size, and a diet will cure most, if not all. my reply to her would be that she too could most likely use a diet, and a good alignment...or maybe it's written in jest, but would be like me arguing that miatas are horrible. which is never funny, wrong and a total cuntfagbitchhomo move.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 20:59 |
|
So, I take it PIA is out of the question, then?
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:03 |
|
Oh wait, there are comments? This could be fun.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:06 |
|
You know guys ... you're reading it all wrong. What she is really saying is: "Don't put your penis in my vagina I don't want it in there." However she mentions no objections to handjobs, blowjobs, felching or any other rubbing of said penis against external body parts as long as it is mutually agreed to (or better yet the woman requires it) and does not put the female at risk of disease or pregnancy (any enslaving result). Also, she is ok with getting pregnant as long as you just dump the sperm outside and the female desires it.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:06 |
|
You've got the right idea.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:07 |
|
Well, this is pretty crazy, but I'll grant that I've seen this kind of thing happen in other online circles. The Internet enables you to immerse yourself so deeply into any area of interest that you lost all perspective. No matter how extreme your position relative to where you started out, it normalizes and you just tunnel deeper and deeper until your thoughts that seem perfectly reasonable to you, appear totally insane from an outside viewpoint.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:11 |
|
maybe it was just too long...
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:21 |
|
for more fun visit reddit.com/r/tumblrinaction
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:23 |
|
She calls herself a "radfem"...which presumably stands for "radical feminist"...
...people have ideas. Some of those ideas are damned crazy. We call ideas like that "radical", and the people that have them "radicals". Those are pejorative words by design because, generally, an idea is only "radical" if it is "radically different" from the social norm (or possibly from your own, which can come off as asshole-ish, particularly if you are in the minority).
...It therefore stands to reason that anyone that OPENLY refers to themselves as a "radical", are actually just knowingly batshit insane.
Radical Pro-gun (aka "Gun nut") people think there should be a gun or two in the hands of EVERY SINGLE PERSON on the planet. Everybody else (non-radical pro-gun folks included) think that this is unrealistic at best, and batshit at worst.
Radical Liberal (aka "Socialist") people...well, they're socialists. batshit socialists (Note: Not all socialists are batshit).
Radical Ice-cream eater (aka "Fatass") people eat 14 gallons of ice cream a day. Everybody, including people that eat ice cream on the regular...well, 14 gallons would be batshit to just about everyone else I think...
Calling oneself a "Radical Feminist" (or, really, a "Radical [insert-anything-here] is, in my mind, an open admission that anything said by the individual should be met with skepticism at least, and open hostility (of the non-physical kind) at most.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:26 |
|
That's what she said.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:41 |
|
My gf is a self proclaimed feminist, and I asked if she believes this crap. She said no, which isn't surprising considering she gets mad if she doesn't have PIV
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:42 |
|
Muahahah
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:44 |
|
Taliban opens new terrorist camp.....in a vagina.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:46 |
|
I had my wife read this. She said: "what a crazy ass bitch", after we figured out what PIV meant.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 21:51 |
|
I mean.. maybe she just really likes anal.
![]() 02/05/2014 at 22:43 |
|
Thats even worse, considering you used to be put on trial for buggery if caught In flagrante delicto, not too mention the fact that it was considered demeaning as it was the animals way of copulating
![]() 02/05/2014 at 23:14 |
|
I love Fred Armisen but I can't stand this show... It's just so unfunny and I hate that I hate it
![]() 02/05/2014 at 23:44 |
|
Yeah look at us. We want brown diesel rotary Miata wagons. It's happened
![]() 02/06/2014 at 01:10 |
|
Ah crap. I went there to laugh at the crazy article, but then I read the whole thing and uh...I don't know, it started to make sense to me. I strongly disagree with her conclusions, but I do sort of see where she's coming from. At least the way she's defining "PIV" as "a man mounting a woman," there is a dominance/submission dynamic that is inherent to the act. (I wonder what she'd say about woman-on-top PIV.) The man must penetrate (active) and the woman must be penetrated (passive). So I can see how a woman who was not interested in that dynamic in any way would find that particular type of sexual act to be rapey to some degree.
However, her definition of PIV is incredibly narrow and the partners in her narrowly defined scenarios are basically straw men and women. She doesn't allow for different types of sex that both partners might find satisfying. For instance, what if the man's open to being penetrated, and the woman uses a strap-on and they trade off? I mean, she doesn't even acknowledge that many women do get off on submission and wouldn't consider PIV rape even by her definition of it. Or the fact that people can and do maintain boundaries between their regular lives/selves and what goes on in the bedroom. I think there's truth in what she's saying, but she loses me when she says "PIV is always rape" as if her limited perspective is a universal truth.
So...yeah, but ultimately, meh.
![]() 02/06/2014 at 02:37 |
|
I so wanted to post a link to this page and simply put that there are crazy assholes, too bad the comments are closed.
![]() 02/06/2014 at 02:37 |
|
I so wanted to post a link to this page and simply put that there are crazy assholes, too bad the comments are closed.
![]() 02/06/2014 at 02:37 |
|
I so wanted to post a link to this page and simply put that there are crazy assholes, too bad the comments are closed.
![]() 02/06/2014 at 03:52 |
|
That stupid bitch gives real feminists everywhere a bad name. She's basically the westboro baptist church of feminism.
![]() 02/06/2014 at 07:22 |
|
Just to recall a basic fact: Intercourse/PIV is always rape, plain and simple.
Welp, I'm done with that webpage. See ya later.
![]() 02/06/2014 at 10:22 |
|
Broads...amiright?
![]() 02/06/2014 at 19:09 |
|
According to this person, not only is sexual intercourse always rape and violence, but to cause pregnancy is also an unacceptable act of violence, for pregnancy "may hurt, damage or kill." This is clearly spelled out in paragraph four. But by the time we reach paragraph seven, we find that a vagina has a purpose, a "primary function," which is to serve as an avenue for a baby to be born. So if the purpose of a vagina is to facilitate the outcome of pregnancy, and if pregnancy itself is abominable victimization, therefore the nature of the vagina itself is to facilitate the abuse of any unfortunate person who is emburdened with one, even if the person with said vagina becomes pregnant by some means not involving "PIV," such as artificial insemination or the surgical implantation of fertilized eggs. Blame extends beyond vile men and their vile penises; "Nature" or "the Heavenly Creator" or who or what ever conscious thing it is that decides what the purpose of a vagina might be (for the word "purpose" can not mean anything without some kind of mind determining goals and means) has cruelly resolved to abuse women.
There is an obvious means by which women can avoid this abuse by men and Nature; it is simply a.) to reject "PIV" sex and b.) to never get pregnant. To tell you the truth, I'm all for this. There are enough and more than enough people in the world already, and if a woman decides that pregnancy is a monstrous act of violence then it is surely her right to eschew it, not only for her own sake but for the sake of any child who would otherwise have to endure growing up under the tutelage of a mother with a mind like the writer's. Imagine that child's nightmarish, soul-destroying childhood, after which the tragic child would have no chance of a happy life.
![]() 02/07/2014 at 11:01 |
|
Definitely for the best she is so against reproduction, I would pity the child that would have to grow up around such stupidity
![]() 02/08/2014 at 18:35 |
|
That's not funny you rapist.
![]() 02/08/2014 at 18:56 |
|
I dunno why, but I've had this page open in my browser and keep going back and reading articles when I'm bored/waiting for something to load/etc.
First of all, a small part of me wants all the Jezebel members to come comment on this.
Here's some of her more prolific comments that REALLY get the crazy stick stirring.
First thing to remember, is that according to her and her ilk, ALL men are laying in wait, at all times, to hurt, rape, and torture women. Aka do violence! Took me a second to get my head around that. These crazy bitches actually think that all men, are consciously trying to figure out a way to "do violence" to women 100% of the time. I seriously take offense to that. I know I've never done an ounce of violence to any woman...ever. Well excluding all the times I've PIV "raped" them of course.
The other one that really got my head spinning was her talking about childbirth and child rearing. Rearing a male *gasp* child to be specific. She talks about the unbelievable amount of inner turmoil experienced by women when they know they're going to have a male. She talks about not knowing what to do. One on hand she wants to do her womanly duty. On the other hand shes terrified that pregnancy WILL result in another male, who's sole purpose in life is burn, rape, and pillage women.
Oh man that hypocrisy and diversion is delicious. You've gotta be a seriously crazy bitch when you're at a crossroads as to whom you support. Woman kind (because without her, woman everywhere would live not knowing that man's sole mission is PIV rape and abuse), or your own brand new baby boy (knowing damn well hes going to become a serial rapist).
This fucking nutter legitimately believes she's in a shooting war with all male-kind.
![]() 02/09/2014 at 23:00 |
|
That is called group think.
![]() 02/09/2014 at 23:01 |
|
I didnt even read the whole thing. I gave up during paragraph 2.
![]() 02/09/2014 at 23:17 |
|
I made it halfway through the second paragraph... you're a stronger man than I am. I just... I just can't even.
![]() 02/09/2014 at 23:18 |
|
![]() 02/12/2014 at 00:10 |
|
It's like it was written by an anthropologist from an asexual culture.
![]() 02/12/2014 at 02:51 |
|
I'm strongly pro gun and think about 25% of humans are honestly too damn stupid or crazy to own or use a firearm.
![]() 02/12/2014 at 14:46 |
|
That may be true, but in my humble opinion, this (like many things) is a defect in education.
I think about 25% of humans are honestly too damn stupid or crazy to own or use a motorized vehicle. Similarly, the issue is that people aren't getting the education (or sufficient education) to operate one properly, not that cars are evil and should be taken away.
![]() 04/01/2014 at 14:36 |
|
Not to mention that the comments are closed, and most are by her. I'm positive that she deleted all comments that were critical of her position and actually made sense.