![]() 12/10/2014 at 15:47 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
They are both incredibly blurry creatures.
![]() 12/10/2014 at 15:49 |
|
Truth.
![]() 12/10/2014 at 15:51 |
|
so true indeed
![]() 12/10/2014 at 15:58 |
|
Oh! I saw Bigfoot crushing cars at the county fair.
![]() 12/10/2014 at 16:07 |
|
They are very playful creatures, often bounding through thick fog or frolicking in out of focus areas.
![]() 12/10/2014 at 16:18 |
|
Shutter Speed fool! You heard of it?!
![]() 12/10/2014 at 16:20 |
|
I was on high speed mode, but I was also zoomed all the way in as to not spook it. But, alas, Falcons are just so damn blurry.
![]() 12/11/2014 at 12:12 |
|
You really need to get something better, or at least longer focal length. Example of this red-tailed hawk I did. This is at 160mm focal length on a APS crop camera.
I also have a picture I did of a red-tailed hawk in silhouette. Yes, I have a Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L lens.
![]() 12/11/2014 at 12:13 |
|
Otherwise known as "You don't really need IS in your lens if you play your cards right."
![]() 12/11/2014 at 12:52 |
|
That's a hawk, not a Falcon which is why it's not blurry.
![]() 12/11/2014 at 13:40 |
|
Hawks are now commonly used for falconry. Both are birds of prey.
Now go get a better camera and lens.
![]() 12/11/2014 at 13:48 |
|
Hawks are not naturally blurry like Falcons are. My $40 camera does just fine, thank you.
![]() 12/11/2014 at 13:53 |
|
Need bigger subjects...