"No, I don't thank you for the fish at all" (notindetroit)
11/05/2014 at 02:01 • Filed to: None | 1
| 7 |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Cherry_man1
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
11/05/2014 at 02:04 |
|
CP Because Camaro. #MustangorNoting #GranTorinoLife
bob and john
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
11/05/2014 at 02:10 |
|
this thing that comes to mind.
GhostZ
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
11/05/2014 at 02:13 |
|
Auto 1972? $20,000? CP aaaaallll day.
Denver Is Stuck In The 90s
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
11/05/2014 at 02:19 |
|
Seems about 5-10 grand overpriced... CP
StoneCold
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
11/05/2014 at 02:34 |
|
I'd say just about right price, maybe a little on the NP side. Probably firm though.
pip bip - choose Corrour
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
11/05/2014 at 03:07 |
|
crackpipe!
AthomSfere
> No, I don't thank you for the fish at all
11/05/2014 at 06:39 |
|
For a 72, I'd say a little overpriced. At least that chassis shipped with a 350, and it stayed V8...
It will also probably stay around that price for a few years. So you could drive/ maintain it and sell it without much of a hit or maybe even with a little profit.
Also... auto.