"HammerheadFistpunch" (hammerheadfistpunch)
10/20/2014 at 16:44 • Filed to: None
1
7|
"HammerheadFistpunch" (hammerheadfistpunch)
10/20/2014 at 16:44 • Filed to: None | 1
| 7 |
Sorry for the self share, !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! . But wait, there's more! you too can get in on the fun!
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
For Sweden
> HammerheadFistpunch
10/20/2014 at 16:47 |
|
Does the existence of the phrase "tactical tomahawk" mean we've reached Peak Bro?
El-Verde
> For Sweden
10/20/2014 at 16:49 |
|
We're well beyond "Peak Bro", bro.
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> HammerheadFistpunch
10/20/2014 at 17:07 |
|
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
|
HammerheadFistpunch
> RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
10/20/2014 at 17:09 |
|
Okay kids, lets go!
TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
> HammerheadFistpunch
10/20/2014 at 17:44 |
|
A tomahawk is going to be lighter. A 'hawk is more useful for combat and the straight handle is ideal for releasing while throwing. It does good job at bushcraft operations and can handle some chopping, but it's not designed like an axe for that one chore.
So why would I want this axe? If I'm in a combat situation in the bush, 9/10 it's a large predatory animal (and I have failed miserably as most deadly animal encounters can be avoided if you're not an idiot). This thing is going to do fuck all good against a bear and it doesn't chop as well as your standard hatchet. Seems like the type of people who buy these things are the same type of guys who like to wear cammo and tacticool the fuck out of their AR15's.
|
HammerheadFistpunch
> TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
10/20/2014 at 17:48 |
|
ahyup. I see them in the store and say....what? who has a legit need for this?
|
TheBloody, Oppositelock lives on in our shitposts.
> HammerheadFistpunch
10/20/2014 at 17:51 |
|
I think I may have an idea:
