![]() 10/16/2014 at 15:58 • Filed to: PSA | ![]() | ![]() |
Kinja being Kinja there are times when you share a post, click on the link and it is a redirect warning and you cant get there. To fix this, simply remove the redundant part of the URL and it goes. i.e.
if it ends with
1647236594/1647273636/+brian1321
it should be
1647236594
Delete the extra "/1647273636/+brian1321"
and your set.
And now you know
![]() 10/16/2014 at 16:00 |
|
Still failing. There's some irony here.
![]() 10/16/2014 at 16:01 |
|
Both your links do the same thing. The redirect. KINJA ARE WINNAR
![]() 10/16/2014 at 16:04 |
|
![]() 10/16/2014 at 16:04 |
|
I was removing the redundant part at the end of the URL before I was told to remove it. Because I enjoy pages loading. Sometimes you have to use the backspace key to go forwards.
![]() 10/16/2014 at 16:06 |
|
That's one of my favorite gifs.
![]() 10/16/2014 at 16:08 |
|
And now that you've fixed it, you have a grammar mistake. And my set of what?
![]() 10/16/2014 at 16:08 |
|
![]() 10/16/2014 at 16:10 |
|
Your set of brand new...
![]() 10/16/2014 at 16:10 |
|
Will Power: never not funny.
![]() 10/16/2014 at 16:23 |
|
I was going to say something about it. But then you did instead.
Nice
![]() 10/16/2014 at 18:09 |
|
Did you notice this before I made that post a couple nights ago? I just wanted to be courteous with that.
![]() 10/16/2014 at 18:10 |
|
nah its good, I figured it out a while ago but I was on mobile and I said "meh, screw it" and so i just deleted it. Too bad though it was James Glickenhuas responding in the most honest and jalop way to a random rant from one of our own. Good stuff.
![]() 10/16/2014 at 18:11 |
|
I actually really wanted to see that
![]() 10/16/2014 at 18:12 |
|
dude is pimp.
![]() 10/16/2014 at 18:15 |
|
Ok, I like him. Lets get him over here to Oppo
10/16/2014 at 21:43 |
|
Damn, how'd I miss this post? I Just emailed Gawker Help about it.
![]() 10/17/2014 at 00:53 |
|
Thanks for the heads up. :thumbup:
![]() 10/20/2014 at 13:42 |
|
Hey, the post ID "redundancy" is the structure for a reframe, which is a share that adds additional information on top of the original post. Using your example, 1647236594/1647273636/+brian1321 :
1647236594: the original post ID
1647273636: the reframe post ID
+brian1321: the author of the reframe, added to single out replies the author has interacted with
By removing the extra part of the URL as stated in your instructions above, you will view the original post without the extra information added by the author, which is the entire point of a reframe. For more about reframes, you can see this entry in our support center.
It seems the loop could be caused by a post that is reframed and then saved as a draft, which is a bug we're in the process of addressing.
Hope this helps!
![]() 10/20/2014 at 13:44 |
|
That's interesting information Ernie but truth is...it works my way and doesn't work your way and I'm not the only one with this problem. So, for what its worth, unless that additional information is helpful, I'm going to continue to drop it.
![]() 10/20/2014 at 13:50 |
|
My reply isn't contradictory to yours, it's only added information to inform you what the extra part of that URL is, and what dropping it does. Not every reframe will lead you to a redirect loop (reframed comments will) or malfunctioning URL (drafted reframes will), but if you'd prefer to trim the URL each time you see a reframe please do!
![]() 10/20/2014 at 13:57 |
|
cool, thanks. So is there i fix for the 2 above mentioned issues (redirect loop and malfunctioning url) in the works so I don't have to?
![]() 10/20/2014 at 14:01 |
|
There sure is. They should be out within the next week or so.