UPDATE: Dickhead Pleads Guilty For Brands Track Invasion

"NickDavisGB" (NickDavisGB) 10/10/2014 at 10:21 • Filed to: BRANDS HATCH

3

20

Jack Cottle has pleaded guilty at !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! today. Bailed for sentencing November 17. Told to expect Prison time. Good !!

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

Crest > NickDavisGB 10/10/2014 at 10:25

1

They should just break one of his legs and call it a day. That idiot could have killed somebody. He can drive automatics in the meantime

thebigbossyboss > NickDavisGB 10/10/2014 at 10:28

1

Huzzah!!!!

What a fool. Hope he has fun in jail.

Nibbles > NickDavisGB 10/10/2014 at 10:30

1

I hope he burns 

up his drivers license and never re-applies

William Byrd > NickDavisGB 10/10/2014 at 10:38

1

Good, that was ridiculous.

Tohru > NickDavisGB 10/10/2014 at 10:39

2

They should have him pistol-whipped by the NYPD.

NickDavisGB > Tohru 10/10/2014 at 10:44

1

Speaking of NYPD. Did you notice our SWAT guys arrested 4 terrorists last week without firing a shot !!

djmt1 > NickDavisGB 10/10/2014 at 10:46

1

Being a young English male, Insurance companies pretty much hate me and I hate them too but knowing that they will essentially price this idiot off the road does win some goodwill points.

NickDavisGB > djmt1 10/10/2014 at 10:52

1

Depends on the charge, he's plead guilty to "causing a nuisance to the public by driving on to the race track at Brands Hatch whilst an endurance race was in progress". Which I don't think will come up on his driving history.

djmt1 > NickDavisGB 10/10/2014 at 10:57

2

Saying yes to one of these makes your claim skyrocket if you're young so I'm guessing he won't be driving for a while. Plus He must of been put of some form of blacklist.

The Transporter > djmt1 10/10/2014 at 11:00

1

What would happen if he just said no?

The Transporter > NickDavisGB 10/10/2014 at 11:02

3

If four terrorists were arrested without anyone firing a shot, then it wasn't the NYPD SWAT.

djmt1 > The Transporter 10/10/2014 at 11:04

1

He would be committing fraud and face 10 years in prison.

The Transporter > djmt1 10/10/2014 at 11:07

1

But would the insurance company look up his record if he said no?

djmt1 > The Transporter 10/10/2014 at 11:09

1

Yup. They do some background checking and give you the opportunity to correct your details otherwise they just reject it.

NickDavisGB > The Transporter 10/10/2014 at 11:17

1

Sorry I meant the UK's SWAT. Known as the TSG (Territorial Support Group) over here.

NickDavisGB > djmt1 10/10/2014 at 11:20

2

I guess "non-motoring convictions" would count. Although my insurance company only asks for motoring convictions. I presume that insurance companies have some sort of illegal blacklist (like the construction companies used to have).

The Transporter > djmt1 10/10/2014 at 12:55

1

It makes me wonder why they would even bother asking the question if they're going to get the truth anyway.

djmt1 > The Transporter 10/10/2014 at 13:02

1

legal reasons probably

The Transporter > NickDavisGB 10/10/2014 at 13:28

1

The TSG probably gave them a stern warning and a look of disapproval.

NickDavisGB > The Transporter 10/10/2014 at 13:41

1

Terribly British - send in the Headmistress.