![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:17 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
At least it wasn't a manual
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:20 |
|
Shouldn't that be wasn't?
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:21 |
|
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:21 |
|
Yikes, I hope the engine is salvageable.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:22 |
|
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:22 |
|
IT ALWAYS SAID THAT >.>
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:22 |
|
Was that yours!?
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:23 |
|
Nope. Was Dougs. I wish I had a V. I've got a Fiesta.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:24 |
|
I hope so too. My grandparents 55 Chevy would look pretty cool with a lsa motor in it.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:25 |
|
Well that didn't take long...
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:26 |
|
Of course it did. *bro-fist* *walks away from post whistling and smiling*
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:26 |
|
Sorry to the new owner, (that sucks) but I never understood the attraction of the V wagon.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:27 |
|
Is the engine safe? Can a Chevette somewhere adopt it?
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:29 |
|
I can't comprehend the second portion of your statement. I typed it in to Google Translate and everything.
Still looks like nonsensical jibberish to me.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:31 |
|
Please leave your Jalop card by the door on your way out
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:32 |
|
You're on Oppo and you don't like the V Wagon?!?!?
PERMA BAN!!!!!
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:33 |
|
Assuming it wasn't something/someone else's fault:
Respect the 556hp...and the fact that you're still in a station wagon, not a GT-R.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:35 |
|
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:35 |
|
That looks like an extremely hard hit. I would like to know what caused the wreck. Looks almost telephone pole like.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:36 |
|
Whoa, what happened? Pole?
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:43 |
|
With great power comes great responsibility.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:43 |
|
Oh dear. I stirred up a shitnado. Time to back track. I meant "I love V wagons" silly me, you know, butter fingers on the keyboard'
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:47 |
|
I wonder what else's salvageable, maybe the magnetic shocks and rear end?
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:48 |
|
dam, how the fuck did he manage that one?
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:49 |
|
Well the front crumple zone works really well..
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:50 |
|
Yea, they're ugly. Rwd, fast, manual uglywagon.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:50 |
|
It was an auto though.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:52 |
|
"They're" being a generalization, applicable in my mind to most current Caddys.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 12:58 |
|
If it was a manual, he could have installed a Cobb short-throw shifter and would have been fine.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 13:00 |
|
Let's see the pole!
![]() 01/29/2014 at 13:03 |
|
Hey, is this a bad time to say things like.
CTS V Wagon took a Brought-My-Car-Into-Dealership-For-Maintenance-Pole-To-The-Face.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 13:07 |
|
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
![]() 01/29/2014 at 13:09 |
|
Looks like Doug got rid of that car at the perfect time.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 13:26 |
|
Doug says they guy fell asleep and hit a tree...
The automotive equivalent of "I fell down some stairs"?
![]() 01/29/2014 at 13:31 |
|
![]() 01/29/2014 at 13:35 |
|
Appearance isn't important.
What can you dislike about a crazy fast RWD car that can also double as a moving van?
Nothing
![]() 01/29/2014 at 13:41 |
|
right in the feels
![]() 01/29/2014 at 14:02 |
|
Good to see I'm not the only one here. Yeah, its big and fast. But holy shit is it UGLY. And not good ugly either, it's just plain fugly.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 14:09 |
|
...wut?
Appearance isn't important? Or was that a joke.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 14:21 |
|
It's really not all that important.
Besides, the V wagon looks good.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 14:39 |
|
How does one even fall asleep at the wheel of a V wagon?
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:00 |
|
Yer trollin' me brah.
On paper, they're more or less the same thing. One looks awful, one is attractive. Which would you rather drive tonight? Appearance is very very important when talking about cars, I would argue about 35% of the content of this site is aesthetic platitudes.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:05 |
|
Okay, I suppose what I meant is in the lust of the CTS-V wagon, appearance isn't important.
It's the closest thing to an ultimate Jalop vehicle we can get in the states. RWD, Manual, fast wagon. It's not the sexiest car on the road, but it's good looking for a wagon and it goes like stink.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:13 |
|
You, sir have been brainwashed by the Jalopagandastapo. It's wunnerful to have such a wagon state-side, don't get me wrong, but too much Coolaid tends to blind people to things other than the Sacred Orthodox Bible of Cars We Think Are Cool. This place is getting pretty dogmatic.
Speaking of which, brown's a great color, but if I was to buy an RS6 Avant, it sure as hell wouldn't be brown.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:31 |
|
Well, I don't dislike it, I just think I'd take the Coupe or the sedan over it. I don't need a moving van, I barely have stuff to move at all, haha...
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:35 |
|
I haven't been brainwashed. A coupe isn't practical for me, and a sedan is pushing it. Hatchbacks and wagons are far more appealing to me as I need the space, and the CTS-V is a particularly appealing wagon.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:42 |
|
You don't, some of us do.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:42 |
|
Cool! I personally want an old Audi AllRoad with the 4.2 nom nom nom
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:48 |
|
Yep, I know, that's why they don't really do anything for me personally. I'm not bashing them, just saying that if pressed to choose, I'd take the coupe, that's how far my spatial needs go.
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:53 |
|
I think I'm on an Audi kick.. this feels funny..
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:53 |
|
Agreed, I've always disliked defining stuff as jalop and unjalop. I always thought that was supposed to be tongue in cheek, because, seriously, we can't all like the exact same stuff. That would be boring!
![]() 01/29/2014 at 15:54 |
|
Yea, tongue in cheek is one thing, but it's getting a little out of hand!
![]() 01/29/2014 at 18:07 |
|
That is what happens when said V-wagon is automatic...