![]() 12/26/2013 at 14:08 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Sucky Nexus 4 picture. Got a brake close up in the comments.
![]() 12/26/2013 at 14:11 |
|
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
and
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 12/26/2013 at 14:23 |
|
They're fake .
![]() 12/26/2013 at 14:24 |
|
Wouldn't it be something if there were GT-R bits hiding under there?
![]() 12/26/2013 at 14:33 |
|
![]() 12/26/2013 at 14:47 |
|
Needs Thornbirds
![]() 12/26/2013 at 14:47 |
|
WTF WHY
![]() 12/26/2013 at 14:48 |
|
Can anyone please explain how a car like this even gets off the lot?
![]() 12/26/2013 at 14:57 |
|
That TL must be a bitch to see out of with the rear window painted white like that.
![]() 12/26/2013 at 15:02 |
|
I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.
Okay okay, a lot a bit.
![]() 12/26/2013 at 15:03 |
|
What car is this?
![]() 12/26/2013 at 15:08 |
|
murano crosscabriolet. Oddball thing no dealer wants on his lot
![]() 12/26/2013 at 15:18 |
|
I mean the white sedan next to it. Kinja fucked up my annotation.
![]() 12/26/2013 at 15:21 |
|
ah shoot I was gonna say! Nothing new there. Looks like an Acura to me, but that isnt my expertise!
![]() 12/26/2013 at 16:00 |
|
Deep, enormous incentives.
![]() 12/26/2013 at 16:10 |
|
Like what? Unlimited blow jobs for life? Seriously, if someone offered this to me for $1,000 I'd buy it to sell it for parts or push it off the nearest cliff.
![]() 12/26/2013 at 16:12 |
|
Acura TL which due to sun glare appears to have a painted white rear window.
![]() 12/26/2013 at 16:14 |
|
3rd gen (2004-2008) Acura TL. Judging by the taillights with white sections in the lenses, it's an '07-'08 base model i.e. not Type-S.
![]() 12/26/2013 at 16:27 |
|
Thanks, now I see it.
![]() 12/26/2013 at 16:32 |
|
Old people seem to like it.
![]() 12/26/2013 at 17:12 |
|
![]() 12/26/2013 at 17:16 |
|
Why not? People do worse things for style
![]() 12/26/2013 at 18:44 |
|
I'd actually be really interested in seeing a CrossCabriolet-R
![]() 12/26/2013 at 19:21 |
|
The answer to a question nobody asked.
![]() 12/27/2013 at 22:36 |
|
Somehow this is not a trademark problem?