12/03/2013 at 14:10 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Why the fat ass? And why Aston greenhouse on the car that has fat ass ?
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:13 |
|
Aston greenhouse because sexy, Fat ass because current automotive restrictions and regulations: see CTS coupe
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:14 |
|
1) Safety regulations.
2) They can do whatever the hell they want.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:16 |
|
Too bad the Mustang can't look attractive like the CTS does.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:16 |
|
Seems to me that it has similar greenhouse/ass proportions as Aston
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:16 |
|
Euro supermodel up front. American stripper in the rear. Fun for everybody?
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:21 |
|
Dat kink.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:21 |
|
Wait so is this it?! Is this what Jalop has been salivating over the past couple of weeks? Meh.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:22 |
|
Do keep in mind that this crease here is making the car, particularly the greenhouse, look far shorter than it is. As for the quarter window, I agree, it should have been done differently, maybe make it shorter and more vertical than the fastbacked pillars, like in the 69 and 70 Mustangs.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:23 |
|
dat silhouette
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:32 |
|
Just checking. Nothing to see here. Move it along.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:34 |
|
I agree, the roofline is wrong. It doesn't say "Mustang," it says "Generic Sports Coupe."
And my god, beltlines are just going to continue to rise until all we have are fucking portholes. I swear.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:37 |
|
Along with a 300hp 4-cylinder, a 3000 lbs weight, and independent rear suspension, I'm really liking this mustang.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:45 |
|
Meh.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:48 |
|
Not portholes, gun slits. This is America, after all.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:50 |
|
The CTS Coupe is hideous.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:50 |
|
Better looking than the new Mustang
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:51 |
|
I agree the crease is making this car FUGLY!
![]() 12/03/2013 at 14:54 |
|
CTS Coupe is more ballsy in design.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 15:02 |
|
I can't wait until Thursday when I can discuss this cool stuff with you guys.
They better release all the info. This shit is killing me.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 15:08 |
|
So... every sports-coupe in the last 20 years had that styling feature.....
![]() 12/03/2013 at 15:50 |
|
I'm with this guy. That thing is UGLY from nose to tail.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 15:52 |
|
What some two door sportscars kind of have similar profiles???? SHOCKING. also that mustang looks nothing like a 370Z..
![]() 12/03/2013 at 15:56 |
|
This car is supposed to debut in two days so I'm gonna say this is still just a rendering.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 16:06 |
|
Calm down buddy. The A-pillar and roof looked similar at first glance to me.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 16:09 |
|
If this is the final version, this makes me so angry for some reason.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 16:09 |
|
sorry lol. the worst part is Ford won't have enough since to make it a liftback, and we'll have another teeny tiny truck on our hands. ugh
![]() 12/03/2013 at 16:59 |
|
Hey guys! What's going on in this thr... OOH SHIT.
![]() 12/03/2013 at 23:17 |
|
It's gross.
![]() 12/04/2013 at 11:39 |
|
Roger that. wtf are they doing. hello, no one wants your ugly angled shit.