"gmporschenut also a fan of hondas" (gmporschenut)
01/16/2020 at 19:20 • Filed to: history, Historylopnik
1
3|
"gmporschenut also a fan of hondas" (gmporschenut)
01/16/2020 at 19:20 • Filed to: history, Historylopnik | 1
| 3 |
With only Connecticut and Rhode Island standing firm.
“T he phrase “intoxicating !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! ” would not logically have included beer and wine (as they are not distilled), and their inclusion in the prohibition came as a surprise to the general public, as well as wine and beer makers. This controversy caused many Northern states to not abide by the amendment, which caused some problems. !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! The brewers were probably not the only Americans to be surprised at the severity of the regime thus created. Voters who considered their own drinking habits blameless, but who supported prohibition to discipline others, also received a rude shock. That shock came with the realization that federal prohibition went much farther in the direction of banning personal consumption than all local prohibition ordinances and many state prohibition statutes. National Prohibition turned out to be quite a different beast than its local and state cousins.”
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
vondon302
> gmporschenut also a fan of hondas
01/16/2020 at 19:46 |
|
For Sweden
> gmporschenut also a fan of hondas
01/16/2020 at 19:54 |
|
Drinking alcohol means:
You can’t drive
You can’t use the alcohol to fuel race cars
What’s the appeal?
|
gmporschenut also a fan of hondas
> For Sweden
01/16/2020 at 19:59 |
|
also ethanol sucks for older cars