A+ work

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 04/07/2019 at 11:20 • Filed to: None

1

8

/sarcasm

LOREM IPSUM > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/07/2019 at 11:30

5

He never touched the brakes. Is it just me, or did that seem intentional?

Let me ask, had the roles been reversed, would the student have gotten off without a litany of charges? Methinks not, most likely. 

Daily Drives a Dragon - One Last Lap > LOREM IPSUM 04/07/2019 at 11:38

6

He 100% was still on throttle. I think it was intentional.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > LOREM IPSUM 04/07/2019 at 11:42

3

Looked intentional to me.

fintail > LOREM IPSUM 04/07/2019 at 11:48

2

Depending on the location and background of those involved, the kid may have been aerated, to put it nicely. Damage to both cars should come from the pension of the warrior. LOL right.

For all of the bitching and moaning the so-called right bleats about unions, they are 100% unwilling to address the abuses of the most  untouchable one in the land.

LOREM IPSUM > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/07/2019 at 11:55

0

 Adrenaline is a heluva drug.

facw > LOREM IPSUM 04/07/2019 at 11:57

6

I’m willing to apply Hanlon’s razor, but that still says he’s a moron. That was extremely reckless, especially when you consider that basically 100% of bomb scares are false alarms. No reason to put anyone, including himself, at risk by driving like that.

Chariotoflove > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 04/08/2019 at 00:15

1

Bad form that the officer is protesting his one day suspension.  That’s a pretty light punishment for recklessly causing injury to an innocent kid.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Chariotoflove 04/08/2019 at 01:03

1

Agreed