"Boxer_4" (Boxer_4)
10/20/2019 at 22:36 • Filed to: None
2
7|
"Boxer_4" (Boxer_4)
10/20/2019 at 22:36 • Filed to: None | 2
| 7 |
Anyone !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! ? This thing couldn’t be any more ‘90s if it tried...
shop-teacher
> Boxer_4
10/20/2019 at 22:49 |
|
I think I'm in love!
Urambo Tauro
> Boxer_4
10/20/2019 at 22:52 |
|
It’s s o weird, seeing a Dakota with a tandem axle.
themanwithsauce - has as many vehicles as job titles
> Boxer_4
10/20/2019 at 23:23 |
|
So....they used a dakota to save fuel, but got a tandem axle because it wasn’t strong enough.....
I feel like someone got something horribly wrong in the design process for this vehicle.
|
Boxer_4
> themanwithsauce - has as many vehicles as job titles
10/20/2019 at 23:26 |
|
And it’s the 3.9 V6, too. I can’t imagine that it’s that great to drive...
facw
> themanwithsauce - has as many vehicles as job titles
10/20/2019 at 23:27 |
|
Maybe they wanted something with a smaller cab to maximize space available for the over-cab area?
|
themanwithsauce - has as many vehicles as job titles
> facw
10/21/2019 at 01:05 |
|
Trying to use that logic, I can’t follow that train of thought. Why not use a slightly lower spring setup for a full size pickup single cab? Motorhomes aren’t built on trucks to be used off road, so you could easily design a bit of a lowered pickup or van chassis to get your increased overhead area while not having to make a tandem axle setup on a chassis never designed for one.
ITA97, now with more Jag @ opposite-lock.com
> Boxer_4
10/21/2019 at 01:08 |
|
I hoped they spec’d it with the limited slip diff, otherwise I could see that thing having trouble with stuff like normal driveway entrances when the tag axle unloads the drive. Even then, it still wouldn't be great.