![]() 08/17/2018 at 17:16 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Its fine I guess if you want to post a gizmodo story about, I don’t know, robotic leaf blowers or mark zuckerberg losing an eye fighting a bot or...whatever but what possible logic could be used to justify subjecting your viewers eyes to a vibrating phonedong?!
Its not germain, its not safe for work, its not universally relevant.
WHY!
Bad GMG, BAD!
![]() 08/17/2018 at 17:41 |
|
I’m already on the case:
![]() 08/17/2018 at 17:43 |
|
But this family of #Content #Blogs is on record saying sex toys are bad
https://jezebel.com/the-uplifting-tale-of-one-bros-fledgling-japanese-sex-1501380416
![]() 08/17/2018 at 17:44 |
|
Yet someone can make a joke about a celeb beef article being more appropriate for Jezebel than Jalopnik and Ballaban gets his shorts all bunched up and greys him. smh
![]() 08/17/2018 at 17:45 |
|
Gawker (and by extension Gizmodo) has always been what you’d get if you told a pack of 13 year olds to start up a news site.
![]() 08/17/2018 at 17:47 |
|
K W A L I T Y
![]() 08/17/2018 at 17:48 |
|
thats true and fine and all...but who thinks this should be shared to Jalopnik? They used to defend it saying that stories about...i don’t know...the electric grid are in Jalops wheelhouse because we are all affected or because its got a transportation bent. This story...its not in the wheelhouse, its not even on the water.
![]() 08/17/2018 at 17:51 |
|
It’s a machine, right?
![]() 08/17/2018 at 17:55 |
|
08/17/2018 at 18:00 |
|
... And then that site got hammered after it went up against someone bitchier and wealthier, so the tattered remnants get bought up by another media conglomerate that has no clue what it’s doing...
![]() 08/17/2018 at 18:26 |
|
If you can get whacked by a dildo driving down the highway...then you can get whacked by a dildo reading Jalopnik.
![]() 08/17/2018 at 19:03 |
|
This is what happens when we don't whitelist