![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:14 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
And we move heaven and earth to stop drugs
This is so much more complex than this man argues.
Also, what the fuck INE? I don’t pay my tax pesos for a 360p maximum resolution
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:23 |
|
a link to the video would be nice
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:25 |
|
You want to watch a spanish language foreign presidential debate?
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:27 |
|
Nah, just make a new context-less post every 5 minutes giving a play by play instead...
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:29 |
|
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:29 |
|
no i want spongebob memes
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:32 |
|
https://twitter.com/hashtag/DebateINE?src=tren&data_id=tweet%3A998296195209580544
source for memes
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:32 |
|
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:33 |
|
good boy
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:36 |
|
we get our most accurate news through spongebob memes up in the states...
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:45 |
|
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:46 |
|
There should be a free flow of drugs AND weapons north and south across the border
FREE TRADE YEAH
![]() 05/20/2018 at 23:59 |
|
I mean, it would make Mexico safer, a lot safer actually, because drugs would become way cheaper and cartels would be less profitable
![]() 05/21/2018 at 00:02 |
|
Yeah things aren’t the same since Jon Stewart retired.
The Onion isn’t bad tho
![]() 05/21/2018 at 00:03 |
|
Completely agree. The easiest and most effective way to end the “War on Drugs” is to legalize it all.
Big Pharma would put the cartels out of business within a year.
![]() 05/21/2018 at 00:03 |
|
Hey now - without the drugs no one would need the weapons. And then where would we get that sweet sweet gun money from?
![]() 05/21/2018 at 00:05 |
|
I mean, I think that, unless there’s a prohibition like with Canadian drugs, IMSS will destroy big pharma....
![]() 05/21/2018 at 00:29 |
|
You share a border with the biggest arms dealer on earth. Good luck stopping that flow. Mexican drugs are largely regarded as cheap and shitty. Any asshole with a stove can make meth, big pharma supplies the US with opiates and you can get legal high potency marijuana in most western states. The cartels have moved into much more profitable businesses which will be around long after the next Mexican president. They followed the Italian model, and will have mostly “legitimate” businesses in the near future, thus disappearing into the fray. They’ve already started to do this with their state side operations.
![]() 05/21/2018 at 00:33 |
|
“This is so much more complex than this man argues.”
![]() 05/21/2018 at 00:40 |
|
I mean, it would make Mexico safer, a lot safer actually, because drugs would become way cheaper and cartels would be less profitable
No it wouldn’t. It’s a much more complex than you argue.
![]() 05/21/2018 at 00:45 |
|
Oh....
Well quote the comment!
Also, pot makes around 50% of the cartel’s money, lets imagine that smuggling pot becomes way cheaper, lets say it’s now ten cents on the dollar it used to be, that’s cartels loosing 45% of their income, and also finding a good reason to move directly to their customers rather than running the show from here.
I think it’s a terrible idea, I wouldn’t do it, I think we’re better of creating a joint border patrol and a mutually guarded buffer along the uninhabited areas, but that wouldn’t happen either
![]() 05/21/2018 at 00:59 |
|
What, you want a
single
standard?
![]() 05/21/2018 at 01:05 |
|
I do not understand your question.
![]() 05/21/2018 at 08:59 |
|
As I quickly read your post, my impression was that you were commenting on how hard Mexico is working to staunch the flow of illegal drugs while the US was doing little or nothing stem the tide of firearms flowing south. So its a double standard.
![]() 05/21/2018 at 09:39 |
|
That is the impression that Anaya has. I don’t think it’s your responsibility as a nation to stop the flow of guns south, it should also be said that most security aparatuses meant to stop drugs are subsided by the US government here in Mexico.
The real issue is that we don’t have a proper border patrol, and smugglers fall through the cracks of a broken system.
I think the best solution would be tohave a joint border patrol, bu thats never gonna happen shameful
![]() 05/21/2018 at 09:43 |
|
50% of their profits from marijuana? Where’s that figure from?
![]() 05/21/2018 at 10:01 |
|
In the case of the Sinaloa Cartel, if pot was legalized in the US it’s estimated they would lose
50%
of their earnings by a Mexican reaserch institution called the IMCO.
![]() 05/21/2018 at 14:19 |
|
The study looked at losses of the cartels as a whole if Washington, Oregon and Colorado legalized marijuana. The study found there would be a 30% loss in profit. One of the researchers, Alejandro Hope, told reporters that he estimated the Sinaloa cartel would lose 50%, but the study didn’t actually address that figure .
That study was conducted in 2012, and all three of those states legalized marijuana. The cartels responded by focusing on heroin (hmmmm, big coincidence the US has a huge heroin epidemic now) and cocaine. Their profits definitely didn’t dip by 30%.
The Rand had a much more conservative study and looked at cartel losses if California legalized marijuana (much larger market) and found there would be a negligable impact.
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9559/index1.html
Gotta say that the cartels don’t seem to be hurting too bad. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re involved in the legal weed trade as well at this point.
![]() 05/21/2018 at 14:23 |
|
Yeah, but the study doesn’t focus on a sudden free border, the biggest issue is the border crossing, which if it didn’t exist as the opponout suggested (which I think is a bad idea, btw) would make contraband much easier to smuggle, which would drop the price of all drugs, as you say any idiot with a kitchen can make drugs, which means added competition.
![]() 05/27/2018 at 02:32 |
|
I think he may be saying that the cartels are getting in on the legal marijuana business. They are still involved, but moved the source of the crops.
![]() 05/27/2018 at 02:33 |
|
Sure, why not? They can’t be any worse than the debates with Trump.