![]() 09/09/2017 at 14:19 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I was searching for something on Oppo, and I came across this site. They linked to related posts I wrote for This Date in Aviation History. The entire main article looks like nothing more than a copy/paste of Wikipedia.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 09/09/2017 at 14:25 |
|
Time to get an agent
![]() 09/09/2017 at 14:25 |
|
“Source: the Wikipedia URL”
Someone failed essay writing in high school. For multiple reasons.
![]() 09/09/2017 at 14:27 |
|
The thing reads like a Florida State football player’s homework assignment.
![]() 09/09/2017 at 14:27 |
|
I’ve searched for old TDIAH articles before, and have found them popping up in other places, notably some Korean sites.
![]() 09/09/2017 at 14:31 |
|
Time to get a Korean agent
![]() 09/09/2017 at 14:42 |
|
I’ve seen this before - which is to say, a whole-article reframe/copy-paste. I seem to recall that it’s explicitly okay - something about the open content licensing on Wikipedia and how it works, but I don’t remember the details.
![]() 09/09/2017 at 14:50 |
|
wow
![]() 09/09/2017 at 15:33 |
|
I did something similar on Oppo a couple of years ago, copying an entire news story with a link at the bottom. The author contacted Jalopnik (we were still attached to them) and complained. Hardigree actually went to bat for me.
![]() 09/09/2017 at 16:11 |
|
Yep. Much easier scenario with Wikipedia - all the reuse rules are spelled out.