![]() 08/31/2017 at 20:36 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
I always thought the CTS Coupe looked hideous. This is... an improvement. Still not wonderful but at least it doesn’t look like some sort of ridiculous Rat Fink caricature.
Original:
![]() 08/31/2017 at 20:45 |
|
I saw a sedan today. The 2nd gen V is an example of when the sedan looks better than the coupe
![]() 08/31/2017 at 20:49 |
|
You have to change your username because this is awesome. Should send it to Cadillac, “This is what you should have done!”
Oh, wait.
![]() 08/31/2017 at 20:53 |
|
Getting Kinjad so hard.
![]() 08/31/2017 at 20:53 |
|
THANK!YOU!
I always hated that faux fastback look.
Also, the V-wagon is/was epic.
...I wonder if Chris Harris ever drove one?
![]() 08/31/2017 at 20:53 |
|
I love the CTS-V coupe. Love, love, love.
I also love the leveled beltline version... 10/10 would own
![]() 08/31/2017 at 20:56 |
|
I think the coupe looks better then the sedan. As Sir Mix A Lot once said “I like big butts and I can not lie”.
![]() 08/31/2017 at 20:58 |
|
Better... I always thought the way-too-raked C pillar and that amputee stump of a trunk ruined it.
![]() 08/31/2017 at 21:01 |
|
So much better
![]() 08/31/2017 at 21:06 |
|
I can look at it with out vomiting now. Please tell me this I going to be a weekly feature.
![]() 08/31/2017 at 21:09 |
|
More like 10x an hour at this rate. I’m bored at home and have Photoshop on my laptop, lol.
![]() 08/31/2017 at 21:12 |
|
Definitely an improvement. These things just had too much visual mass at the back to ever look right. One of the rare cases where a notchback would have been an improvement over a fastback.
![]() 09/01/2017 at 07:40 |
|
Ohhhh, this one’s good.