![]() 07/05/2017 at 05:16 • Filed to: Mazda, Mahk, Chevy, Chev, Chevrolet | ![]() | ![]() |
8)
![]() 07/05/2017 at 06:21 |
|
Well that’s a bit embarrassing, but at least Mazda can say that with a straight face, so to speak. Those chevies and the stuff folks were saying about them just sounded like a grab-bag of buzzwords.
![]() 07/05/2017 at 07:51 |
|
At least it doesn’t scream bullshit. The likelihood of it being 100% non fake is probably low, but it doesn’t beat you over the head with obviousness.
![]() 07/05/2017 at 07:59 |
|
Mahk’s on hold
![]() 07/05/2017 at 08:38 |
|
That was great
![]() 07/05/2017 at 08:38 |
|
That was great
![]() 07/05/2017 at 09:01 |
|
I debated commenting this. Glad to see I didn’t need to.
![]() 07/05/2017 at 09:25 |
|
I like to think that maybe a “designer” or “architect” might know enough about the design of mass-consumption goods to recognize the Mazda even in disguise, but seeing how many of those types drive Prius or Tesla, maybe not.
I see these people weren’t from the agency of Real People Not!, Actors.
![]() 07/05/2017 at 10:02 |
|
I saw this steaming shit pile of a commercial at the movies yesterday. IT NEEDS MAHK SO BADLY
![]() 07/05/2017 at 10:02 |
|
YOU KNOW TPT?!?
![]() 07/06/2017 at 00:17 |
|
No one called the CX-9 a “bad mama-jama” so I’m pretty much fine with it.
![]() 07/06/2017 at 03:21 |
|
fair point.