![]() 05/30/2017 at 15:25 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Possibly the cleanest and best condition Astro Van I have ever seen, and one of the few Astro RS I have encountered.
![]() 05/30/2017 at 15:39 |
|
Nice! I had a neighbor for years who had a dark red Astro RS. I always dug the look of that van.
![]() 05/30/2017 at 15:42 |
|
Its pretty cool. I dont know why I’ve always had a soft spot for the Astro and seeing this RS was cool. I got a peek inside and it looks to have been well maintained by the old man that got out of it.
![]() 05/30/2017 at 15:53 |
|
The Astro is great because it’s big enough to haul lots of stuff, while being small enough to park nearly anywhere. They also look pretty good IMO. I particularly love the later dutch door ones.
![]() 05/30/2017 at 15:55 |
|
And being tough as hell. It was one of the few vans that was truck based.
![]() 05/30/2017 at 16:03 |
|
Yep. S-series platform FTW!
![]() 05/30/2017 at 17:27 |
|
Theres little to no S/T chassis under these actually. Unibody with front and rear subframes and a front suspension mostly pulled from the B-Bodies. Driveline has lots of S/T DNA though.
![]() 05/30/2017 at 17:29 |
|
Fuck early M-vans so much. 96+ with a half acceptable interior and not horribly underpowered 4.3 are good though.
Source: suffered through a 94 Safari EXT with low output 4.3.
![]() 06/01/2017 at 15:27 |
|
I had an 88 S10 with the no... err... low output 4.3. Even with a throttle body spacer, headers and performance exhaust it really didn’t matter. It sounded nice at least.