"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
05/27/2017 at 02:31 • Filed to: None | 2 | 4 |
Here’s a proposition: You give us the beastly Audi Q7 V12 TDI with its absurd torque figure, and in return we will give you every !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! , redneck-hauling douchetruck in the country. Which we would happily tow over to Europe behind one of said Q7s were it not for the big watery thing in the way.
Also, we’ll forget this whole “DieselGate” thing ever happened.
beardsbynelly - Rikerbeard
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/27/2017 at 03:17 | 1 |
They can already roll coal though.
slipperysallylikespenguins
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/27/2017 at 09:12 | 0 |
You might have a hard time with that, Q7s are only rated for 6000 lbs or so. ;)
Speed
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/27/2017 at 09:47 | 1 |
I Googled and found 738ft/lbs. DAFUQ will these do with bolt ons and a tune!?
LJ909
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
05/27/2017 at 17:00 | 1 |
I would consider this a good trade. But I like not being broke. And Audi repair costs are doubled when you add in V12 and diesel into the equation.