![]() 05/18/2017 at 02:05 • Filed to: Photography | ![]() | ![]() |
Came across my FB feed:
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 05/18/2017 at 02:14 |
|
This is very cool. Unfortunately my tired mind misassembled the title and now I’m disappointed that this story doesn’t have any Starfighters.
![]() 05/18/2017 at 02:21 |
|
...how can a 100+ year old camera still shoot photos? It can’t. UNLESS HE USED HIS TIME MACHINE TO GO BUY A CAMERA 100 YEARS AGO AND IT’S ACTUALLY ONLY DAYS TO WEEKS OLD IN OUR TIME
![]() 05/18/2017 at 02:29 |
|
I’ve seen this story now a few times, being a photographer, and it is so annoying that they misidentify the camera as a “view camera” when it is a single lens reflex.
BTW, such cameras used to be used extensively for sports and action photography, albeit with a much longer lens:
https://gizmodo.com/this-huge-camera-rig-was-the-howitzer-of-early-action-p-1565650523
![]() 05/18/2017 at 02:51 |
|
I love this one.
![]() 05/18/2017 at 02:52 |
|
BRB, looking for an old camera
05/18/2017 at 03:44 |
|
Cool.
![]() 05/18/2017 at 06:35 |
|
That sounds like it’d leave a nasty wound.
![]() 05/18/2017 at 08:05 |
|
![]() 05/18/2017 at 09:30 |
|
???
![]() 05/18/2017 at 09:33 |
|
Much better.