F1 shot with 104-year-old camera

Kinja'd!!! "leicester" (leicester)
05/18/2017 at 02:05 • Filed to: Photography

Kinja'd!!!13 Kinja'd!!! 10

Came across my FB feed:

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!


DISCUSSION (10)


Kinja'd!!! facw > leicester
05/18/2017 at 02:14

Kinja'd!!!4

This is very cool. Unfortunately my tired mind misassembled the title and now I’m disappointed that this story doesn’t have any Starfighters.


Kinja'd!!! PS9 > leicester
05/18/2017 at 02:21

Kinja'd!!!0

...how can a 100+ year old camera still shoot photos? It can’t. UNLESS HE USED HIS TIME MACHINE TO GO BUY A CAMERA 100 YEARS AGO AND IT’S ACTUALLY ONLY DAYS TO WEEKS OLD IN OUR TIME

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! Berang > leicester
05/18/2017 at 02:29

Kinja'd!!!1

I’ve seen this story now a few times, being a photographer, and it is so annoying that they misidentify the camera as a “view camera” when it is a single lens reflex.

BTW, such cameras used to be used extensively for sports and action photography, albeit with a much longer lens:

https://gizmodo.com/this-huge-camera-rig-was-the-howitzer-of-early-action-p-1565650523


Kinja'd!!! promoted by the color red > leicester
05/18/2017 at 02:51

Kinja'd!!!3

Kinja'd!!!

I love this one.


Kinja'd!!! Rustholes-Are-Weight-Reduction > leicester
05/18/2017 at 02:52

Kinja'd!!!1

BRB, looking for an old camera


Kinja'd!!! KnowsAboutCars > leicester
05/18/2017 at 03:44

Kinja'd!!!0

Cool.


Kinja'd!!! LongbowMkII > leicester
05/18/2017 at 06:35

Kinja'd!!!1

That sounds like it’d leave a nasty wound.


Kinja'd!!! boredalways > promoted by the color red
05/18/2017 at 08:05

Kinja'd!!!1

Kinja'd!!!


Kinja'd!!! S65 > facw
05/18/2017 at 09:30

Kinja'd!!!1

Kinja'd!!!

???


Kinja'd!!! facw > S65
05/18/2017 at 09:33

Kinja'd!!!1

Much better.